Since starting the journey of more film photography, I've played around with Kodak Gold 200 a bit. Both in 35mm and 120 size, I find the overall colors to not really be natural all, but to have hues of warmth and a slight lean to the green side. I'm not saying it's not often pleasing, just that you shouldn't expect it to be the most natural. That being said, it's an affordable consumer level film that can be used professionally in certain circumstances. Outdoors is one of those locations where it can often "shine". Below I'll throw up a series of photos, but one of things you'll notice on the interior shots is that bent of color to overly warm and a touch of green (at least to my eyes). Also, in goes without saying that after digital scanning the film, you can certainly edit the hell out of film photos, but I often choose to "let them be". Also, if you have a keen eye, you might notice the grain of Gold 200 to be a bit more prevalent than something like Portra 400...maybe even Portra 800. Enjoy some 120 Kodak Gold 200 photos of the recent wedding of Jordyn & Ethan.
Kodak Gold 200 Film
9 days ago in #photography by captainbob
1.93 VYB
- Past Token Payouts 1.92552188 VYB
- - Author 0.96276106 VYB
- - Curator 0.96276082 VYB
75 votes
- + tattoodjay (0.88605864)
- + ph1102 (0.62475824)
- + bozz (0.25363454)
- + adetorrent (0.11914151)
- + jongolson (0.01122455)
- + chinito (0.00882803)
- + joeyarnoldvn (0.00460990)
- + tikki00taffi (0.00460158)
- + clayboyn (0.00179189)
- + buttcoins (0.00159284)
- + ericburgoyne (0.00147809)
- + tonyz (0.00128900)
- + gabrielatravels (0.00116050)
- + zwhammer (0.00106854)
- + hivebuzz (0.00090273)
- + isnochys (0.00073160)
- + waybeyondpadthai (0.00056715)
- + fijimermaid (0.00049228)
- + pinmapple (0.00045806)
- + rcaine (0.00038767)
- and 55 more