FTC vs Greedy Streaming Companies

in #news11 days ago

ftc.png

Government agencies are not the best problem solvers. But sometimes they things right, and take a stand for what is right, what is logical, and protect ordinary people. Latest drama between FTC and streaming companies is a perfect example of this. Last week Federal Trade Commission announced a new click-to-cancel rule for subscription services. The rule is a very simple expectation, and super logical. We should be wondering why this wasn't a thing a decade ago. As the naming of the rule suggest, the idea is to make cancelling services that require subscription as easy as it is subscribe. Companies are smart, and they spend a lot of money to come up with strategies and tactics to gain and retain new customers. That's why signing up process is almost always fast, simple, and easy. Otherwise, they would be losing money. However, when it comes to cancelling services things get complicated.

Not only it isn't straight forward and easy to navigate, companies take extra steps to make things complicated so that customers do not cancel. It is definitely intentional and deceitful practice. I have had frustrations in the past figuring out how to cancel an online subscription. While these companies haven't made any improvements regarding this matter (intentionally), I don't see this as any issue anymore and when I decided to cancel I am always able to navigate to the page for cancellation. Practice makes perfect. That's just because I know these companies will continue playing dishonest games as long as it results in money for them. For the same reason, I refuse to pay anything extra.

It didn't take these greedy companies to express their dissatisfaction about FTC's new rule and to sue the FTC. The groups that started the lawsuit are NCTA, Electronic Security Association, and Interactive Advertising Bureau. All the large streaming companies and many more are associated and represented by these groups, one way or the other. Obviously, these companies will fight as long as they can when it comes to making more money. It may actually be cheaper for them to spend money on lawyers and lawsuits, than actually engaging in a free market.

The thing I absolutely dislike about the greed of such companies is that these are the same companies who benefit from free market economies, yet they choose to undermine the free market and play dishonest games to make even more money. The arguments they present against FTC's new rule are hilariously stupid. One of them is that such rules would hurt the customers because it may cause price increases for the services. What?! So it is ok to steal money from people who actually are not using the services, and can't cancel to keep prices lower. It doesn't make sense. I would rather pay higher prices, than my services being paid by those who don't need the services. Moreover, they argument is very weak. Prices are decided by free market supply and demand. They can raise prices all they wan't. If there is no demand at certain price point, they would lose business instead. They know it too. They have experts that do all the calculations day and night. Deception is what they believe in.

Subscription based business models are great for some cases, and absolutely terrible for others. But in all cases they benefit the most one party, and that is the companies offering these services. In streaming business, I think subscription model is a great fit. I doubt pay per content would work well. Some companies tried that already. Amazon, Apple, Youtube, and others have tried pay per content, as rent or buy. They don't really work well. Subscription for such cases a better option. It works for the businesses and works for customers. This also facilitates competition and competition results in better products and services. In some cases subscription is terrible. For example companies like Microsoft making their well known office software subscription based doesn't really help the product. It hasn't improved the product at all, but they get to continuously collect money as if they are selling a new product. That is due the monopoly they have built in their areas. There are cases where subscription is borderline criminal. For example HP printers with subscription for the cartridges where they charge per printed pages, and cancelling the services stops the machine from working completely. That's just beyond greedy.

I think many would agree streaming platforms with subscription plans have worked well in recent years. Netflix started the revolutions, many other joined. The more recent problems with these services is that there are too many of them, and less content available than before. Because they all competing against each other, they make content owned by certain companies unavailable for others. Or they would outbid each other. We end up continuously subscribing and cancelling to manage the budget, that is if we are mindful of the money spent on these services. Sometimes we don't care and forget. There was a time I forgot a subscription for a service for six months that never was being used. They don't care, they will continue collecting the money.

But also there are times we may want to continuously keep services active, just because they provide great service. That was the case with Netflix. I had uninterrupted plan with Netflix for many years, and even when it wasn't used I didn't ming keeping the account active. Because Netflix was a great companies, provided great services, and didn't play deception games. Netflix stayed true to its commitment of no ads for a very long time. As long as they kept that commitment, I had no reason to cancel it. But corporate greed hit Netflix as well, and there came a time to add ads to their services. That was the time my commitment to Netflix ended as well. Since then I only subscribe to Netflix for a short period of time, if find something really interesting there.

Unlike other government agencies FTC has done some really good actions in recent years in protecting the consumers. This new click-to-cancel rule is another great move. That is what these agencies should be doing all the time. Identifying problems and solving them. Especially the easy ones. This one is easy. It make perfect sense. These streaming companies should stop tricking people and building UI that hides the cancel button. It is an easy fix too. It doesn't cost them money to make cancellation a one click process. I would even argue such improvements would make these companies better and prosperous. Anytime deception is removed from companies and their actions are more transparent, they earn people's respect and trust. This would make them focus more on customer service rather than customer deception. This is a much better way of making money, and I am sure they would make a lot of it. The future is heading towards trust or trustless. More and more people will bring their businesses to companies that build trust, or companies that utilize trustless decentralized systems. Those who are greedy and rely on deception will hopefully fail, and leave the space for the honest ones. Hulu is the worst!

Lastly, there is still one company that I trust with subscription and don't mind keeping the account active for a very long time. That is Amazon Prime. Not only it gives access to the digital content, but also is great for the purchases and fast shipping. I can see the effort for great customer service here. I am not saying Amazon is not greedy. But at least their greed is backed with focus for a great products, and reliable services. Amazon does have its problems. Customer service is not one of them.

Sort:  

that is a good move for FTC. I hope they will be able to successfully implement the the click to cancel rule in subscription. it will surely help a lot of people especially those that are not techy.

Greedy companies are hard to control, the more popular a company becomes the greedier it becomes. Netflix started the revolution and its service is now very expensive

Amazon prime is still the best
That’s what I use and as for Hulu, a lot of people don’t use it here so can’t give a review

!PIZZA

Pi coin will break all major exchanges in early 2025, it will be used as everyday money. Mine now using your phone www.minepi.com/zdigital

Pi coin will break all major exchanges in early 2025, it will be used as everyday money. Mine now using your phone www.minepi.com/zdigital

@geekgirl that was a great article, took me a while to complete & reach the comment section but here i am, "Unlike other government agencies FTC has done good actions n protecting the consumers" i agree usually agencies favor the companies & take their side more often, so FTC definitely did a great job with that move, i totally agree that companies r hiding the details or the options that should b a basic costumer right & definitely they r doing it intentionally, & this is not just for the streaming services but also for all services from making social media accounts & apps to search engines "usually google", maps services "usually google", pc operating systems "usually microsoft or apple", websites cookies, every app u download on phone or pc, phone apps stores "google or apple", ai chat bots & ai img generating bots "chatgpt & giant companies developed theirs too", even sim cards & ISPs, they all track u all the time & sell ur data for money, they make a long list that's nearly impossible to read & u opt to click the agree button, this mind game should b stopped -costumers have the right to get things simple & clear to read & understand & refuse what they want to refuse when they want to, also those giant companies don't leave any space for competition when they see any small company with a potential that f kept growing might become a competitor- they play their mind games & end up buying it, that also needs to b dealt with for a more fair game for small & medium businesses. "I would rather pay higher prices, than my services being paid by those who don't need it" totally agree because it feels like fooling o stealing the others, "They can't raise prices all they want If there is no demand at certain price point they would lose business" totally agree & even they agree with that, i heard that about printers but i wasn't sure- how does HP stops it's printers remotely f they r loaded with the HP ink that their consumers bought ? or now it's not enough to just buy their ink & u must also buy an online monthly or yearly subscription to keep it working ?"That's just beyond greedy", "pay per content as rent or buy don't really work well. Subscription is the better option. It works for the businesses and the customers" totally agree, for netflix it indeed made a huge revolution that no one expected just a few decades ago & at it's beginning it seemed to b clean but with time it showed that it has it's own agenda, for amazon prime -well indeed amazon is greedy like all the other giants but it's the closest to the "win win" situation, with the good discounts & fast shipping -i think amazon prime is worth it for those regularly buying from amazon. finally again it was a great article so great job & really well done.

Right, there are too many of them and some people wants to subcribe all of them, which I don't understand.

I like the click to cancel rule. I don't feel any sympathy for the greedy corporations if they make the process as annoying as possible. It's why I don't like signing up for most subscription services as I don't want to deal with all the issues unless I really need it.

Pay per view or pay per content would be beneficial to those that are paying, but we understand that it's mostly about profit for most streaming services. In Nigeria, subscriptional services are ripping off consumers but the lack of competition is even the highest. These guys makes sure it's difficult for others to come into the market, so people would have no other choice. It's diabolical monopoly

One thing I know about companies is that when they realize that they are getting more popular, they tend to increase their subscription rate for no reason
That’s not reasonable

Hello geekgirl!

It's nice to let you know that your article won 🥉 place.
Your post is among the best articles voted 7 days ago by the @hive-lu | King Lucoin Curator by blind-spot

You and your curator receive 0.0253 Lu (Lucoin) investment token and a 6.79% share of the reward from Daily Report 463. Additionally, you can also receive a unique LUBROWN token for taking 3rd place. All you need to do is reblog this report of the day with your winnings.

2.png


Invest in the Lu token (Lucoin) and get paid. With 50 Lu in your wallet, you also become the curator of the @hive-lu which follows your upvote.
Buy Lu on the Hive-Engine exchange | World of Lu created by @szejq

If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP or to resume write a word START