Web 3.0 - Solving The Scalability Problem

in #hive-1735752 months ago

https://img.inleo.io/DQmXN3ze9183uzEfDDeJohyCFhM2k3i5ZCHUDueyoCtRA7g/ai-generated-7957989_1280.webp

Source

Hi there everyone, it's TheRingMaster back again to continue my Web 3.0 based blog series.

We've been looking at the pure potential of Web 3.0 and Hive in particular for quite some time now and two days ago I started sharing a few thoughts on the challenges or hurdles we would need to overcome before Web 3.0 can become as popular as Web 2.0.

In my last blog, I touched on the issue with content moderation and although that's a major challenge we need to pay attention to, I believe the biggest challenge yet with Web 3.0 technology just has to be the scalability problem.

Everyone that is experienced or has spent years on Hive or any Web 3.0 platform would always tell a new comer that the technology has so much potential but is still in the early stages of development. Ideally the main hot topic they will usually bring up is the issue with its scalability.

What exactly is scalability? - Well a lot of you on Hive may already know what it is but in the simplest of terms, scalability of any platform is about how well the platform can accommodate an increasing number of users without slowing down or becoming too expensive.

  • We experience a bit of downtimes or slowing down of the frontends we use but that situation is becoming less often thanks to our able developers and administrators in the various communities and Hive Frontends which includes @ecency team and @inleo team to mention a couple.

Scalability I believe is the biggest limitation to Web 3.0 global adoption - because if we can't handle more people we can't have more people, as simple as that.

Source

Why Is There Even A Scalability Problem On Web 3.0?

  • What's stopping Web 3.0 from becoming as fast as Web 2.0?

The Web 3.0 tech savvy users might already have all the answers to this particular question but just in case you are not aware of exactly why there's even a scalability problem on Web 3.0, I'll explain briefly to you in the best way I possibly can.

Well the truth is there's more than one particular reason for this problem however it all centers around the fact that Web 3.0. is built on Blockchain Technology. - The very nature of Blockchain is actually what accounts for the scalability issues otherwise I think Web 3.0 would have been as smooth and basically no different from Web 2.0 which is not what the developers where shooting for.

Blockchain technology lies at the very core of many Web 3.0 applications if not all of them. Blockchain works like a digital ledger that securely and transparently records transactions made on it. The fact that no single entity controls it means it’s decentralized hence it becomes a fair and trustful too.

However, such decentralization entails sacrificing something else too. There's always going to be a trade-off for something that is good right?

Source

Speed and Capacity

All Web 3.0 transactions would have to be verified across a network of computers or nodes, which takes time. With more people using these systems, they may eventually get congested leading to delays and don't forget higher fees on transactions. So the security and transparency you get for using Web 3.0 has been exchanged for speed and limited capacity in a way.

You may consider Web 2.0 platforms as being faster and normally having more users but the truth is they are less secured and centrally controlled by the organizations that run the platforms.

Source

Resource Intensive

Another one of the biggest reasons for the scalability issues on Web 3.0 is its resource intensiveness. Running a blockchain node requires significant computational power and storage capacity.

This is mainly the reason why mining Bitcoin or any of the alt coins is very expensive. The computational power required needs more electrical energy and computer storage capacity.

This can really make it difficult for the network to grow as more users come in and that would also end up leading to slow processing times, and a few crashes here and there.

https://img.inleo.io/DQmYBvxZZnH1qKEYJM71BT9pZcZPw7UskhQiBTvhfd5Dg5M/problem-5273058_1280.webp

Source

So What Solutions Are In The Pipeline

The Main objective of my blog is to highlight the solutions to the problem and not just the problem itself. I actually believe there's much optimism in the Web 3.0 community since developers are actively working on making scalability better and better each day.

Here on Hive you see updates to the frontends happening regularly and that's a positive sign that one day sooner than later, we would have a very scalable Web 3.0 or Hive.

I'm going to highlight on two promising ways the issue of scalability on Web 3.0 is being tackled afterwards we'll discuss when the solution will manifest fully in the chain.

Source

Sidechains

Not many people know what Sidechains are but if you ask me I'd say it works just like how any assistant tool works. Sidechains are also Blockchains but they're there not to run their own operations but a piece of the operations of a main chain. The side chains are connected to the main chain so that it takes a part of the workload.

Just like I established before, Blockchains or let me say main Blockchains are usually slow and any attempt to speed it up would probably end up making it less secure or safe. So a great solution would be to create a smaller chain which would be the Sidechain to take some of the workload off of the main chain.

However one issue we have with these Sidechains is that they are not as decentralized as the main Blockchains so by connecting them to the main chains we are going to end up trading off some amount security for speed.

But I think it's logically ok to do. Why do I say that? Well Sidechains will trade-off security for speed but it's not going to happen in the main chain so we kind of maintain the security and Decentralization of the main chain will increasing its speed of transactions.

So the Sidechains will do a great job of removing transactions which do not need to be processed on the main blockchain thereby reducing congestion and boosting speed in transactions.

By connecting sidechains to Web 3.0 Blockchains, we will be able to transfer assets such as tokens between the main chain and sidechains making it more flexible and therefore scalable.

Ethereum uses this method well

Source

State Channels

Another interesting solution to the scalability problem is state channels. What if we could process some of the transactions we need to make, but this time, off-chain. Now you might say "hey wouldn't than mean no Blockchain benefits?" - not exactly.

We will not be handling the entire transaction off chain but a part of it. The final decision of the transactions will be made on the primary chain which will lead to increased security and also since it will be recorded on the chain's public ledger, there'll be transparency while speed increases further. The good thing is that the cost will also reduce since the whole process will not be done in the main Blockchain.

I believe that's another great solution to the scalability problem however more technology and more innovation keeps coming up as the Web 3.0 developers and communities keep looking for ways to improve the entire platform.

I would absolutely love to get feedback on some of the other ways you think the issue of Web 3.0 scalability is being tackled.

https://img.inleo.io/DQmUW8jmbxe9SusgtfJN1DE1RBAoH7Qs6TSqVuats3EkRfm/question-mark-2492009_1280.webp

Source

When Will We See These Solutions In Action?

The good news I have for you is that these solutions are already being developed and tested.

The teams and organizations responsible for projects like Ethereum are actively working on implementing sidechains and state channels,

Let me give you a couple examples and you can follow the links to their main sites

Honestly it may take some time before wide adoption occurs since they have to be further refined and integrated into more applications but I think as long as there's continuous progress, it would be an eventuality for the world.

Source

Future Prospects

I shared this blog not only to address the fact that solutions to the Web 3.0 scalability issues are being worked on but also to encourage and inspire my fellow Web 3.0 members to be very enthusiastic about the future of this platform. Patience is the most important virtue you need for your Web 3.0 journey.

These solutions I talked about will speed up transactions on Web 3.0 while at the same time reduce their costs and this would enable more and more people to adopt decentralized applications on a wider scale.

Thank you so much for the time taken to read the blog. As always I would absolutely love to get your feedback on the topic discussion.

Which other solutions do you think can help solve the scalability problem of Web 3.0 or Hive?

Posted Using InLeo Alpha

Sort:  

I think the side chain sounds okay.. the other one sounds shady af.. but then again I'm not a nerd..

Hehehe brother you're actually right, I believe the side chains may be the best but perhaps it's my fault for not explaining state channels well enough hahahahah... I'm so so grateful you took the time to visit my blog, it means the world to me brother. !WEED

PIZZA!

$PIZZA slices delivered:
@theringmaster(2/5) tipped @alonicus
theringmaster tipped anderssinho

Keep up the good work. 👏

Recognized by Mystic artist Gudasol

You are loved.

Interested to to help music map cXc.world spread more good vibes on Hive?.

Congratulations @theringmaster! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)

You received more than 10000 upvotes.
Your next target is to reach 15000 upvotes.
You got more than 4750 replies.
Your next target is to reach 5000 replies.
You made more than 8500 comments.
Your next target is to reach 9000 comments.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Check out our last posts:

Hive Power Up Day - July 1st 2024

My goodness @hivebuzz 10,000 Upvotes that's a great milestone for me I'm so happy and I'm grateful you were there all through

10k upvotes is a major milestone. Awesome work @theringmaster 👍

Hive-engine is like a sidechain to Hive right?

Hehehehe not quite brother, wow I really have to explain these things more so my friends can understand 😁 Hive Engine is not exactly a sidechain to Hive but rather a second-layer solution that is built on top of the Hive blockchain just like how you will have SplinterLands or three speak. With side chains, they are actually Blockchains on their own. But they don't operate for themselves but handle a couple of tasks for the main Chain. At the moment since I'm new here and still exploring everything about Hive, I haven't seen Hive's Sidechain for myself but there's quite a lot of second layer solutions here. I'm hopeful that as we keep improving Hive we would see some scalability solutions come bro. Wow I have to write a full blog for you personally man hahahaha, it would be a pleasure brother. Thank you so very much for commenting and for taking your precious time to visit my blog, I'm grateful for this. !PIZZA

I'm not a techie, but I feel the answer has to be that harnessing some of the surplus computing power of the users would naturally match adoption and the scaling needed.

For Hive, I think we need developers who can look at how the nodes work and develop a "super light" node which anyone can install and run without too much technical knowledge or loss of computing power. I'm sure people far more intelligent than I am could come up with ways to distribute the workload but still be able to build the data back into the blockchain in a coherent, secure and trustworthy way.

As an example, the super-light nodes could take "one way" transactions (e.g. posts and comments), bundle them up into blocks and then submit them to the full nodes to be integrated into the blockchain, and I'm sure something similar could be done with simple two-way transactions (upvotes, transfers of HBD to savings etc) with appropriate mechanisms to ensure there wasn't any double counting of operations or double spending of funds.

My goodness brother this is also a brilliant idea. So true, delegating work load or lighter nodes will be an effective solution. I'm certain the programmers can do this that if they're not already working on it secretly. Good thing bro it's amazing !PIZZA