— VerifyYourBrain

valued-customer in #life • 14 days ago

"I see you didn't make it to the bottom of that article that says there's no proof blood transfusions reverse aging."

I see you continue to put words in my mouth. I say 'retard aging' and you insert 'reverse aging'. These are not at all the same thing. The blood factors from kids transfused into old people definitely supply those factors that have degraded physical condition of the aged due to their lack. That isn't in any way rejuvenating or restoring youth to the aged, but is simply retarding that degradation caused by lack of those factors due to aging.

These technologies need to be tested before the people that can afford them will buy them. Scamming is what 'Jews' do. They've always done so, and will always do so as long as they exist, so doing so now is nothing new.

IMG source - random anonymous internet post

14 days ago in #life by valued-customer

Sort:

sunlit7 12 days ago

I see you continue to put words in my mouth. I say 'retard aging' and you insert 'reverse aging.

Tit for tat, still doesn't deflect from the disclaimer at the bottom of the article, that would have, like you said, meant "retard" aging.

Really Ralph, you going to come at me with some chart pointing out bias in calling out Jews while others got high scores in various areas, some even higher than Jews.

0.21 VYB

1 vote

[-]

valued-customer 12 days ago

"...the disclaimer at the bottom of the article, that would have, like you said, meant "retard" aging."

No, that's the problem. You keep conflating what that article said with what I said. That article denied reversing aging was possible, and I said retarding aging was happening. We're not using the same words, not talking about the same thing, and you keep saying I'm not agreeing with the article - that I don't agree with BTW.

"Really Ralph, you going to come at me with some chart pointing out bias in calling out Jews while others got high scores in various areas, some even higher than Jews."

Are you trying to defend Thiel because he's a Jew? I don't care if he's Jewish or not. I don't like his business, his manner, his policies, or his eating babies, or however he takes their blood. If he's Jewish, he's an example of a Jew I don't like. However, he doesn't look very brown, so I bet his ancestry is from Europe, meaning he's one of them Jews that call themselves Jews but aren't Jews (if in fact he claims to be Jewish) but are instead the Synagogue of Satan - which would fit perfectly with Mileikowski and eating baby blood.

0.00 VYB

[-]

sunlit7 8 days ago

Still tit for tat.

No, I don't like Thiel at all. I was talking directly of your biased chart.

0.00 VYB