For me, Chelsea is 1-nil ahead of City if not for Chelsea's "deadly" goalkeeping.
You simply cannot have such a goalkeeper as a top side. It's like an abomination. He kept gifting City chance after chance.
He actually created the goal for City. Cucurella did what top class defenders do- body check the attacker, disturb him, to buy his keeper some time.
Painfully his keeper couldn't understand this simple task and the goal came.
Manchester City has more problems than Chelsea, if not for that goalkeeper.
Well we talk organisation in my team, Arsenal, so we are experts in that regard.
Chelsea's organisation was top class mostly and Man City couldn't impose themselves really in that first half.
Only Madueke needs a little talking to, to track back more.
I forgot to say how Sanchez is poor with his feet too.
Chelsea has not even hit their full attacking synergy and energy and yet you could see City were not assured in defence. In the midfield too, Chelsea is stronger in 50-50 balls. City had more problems, general in that first half.
Chelsea should be leading by now. It's just terrible goalkeeping. It's one all at the break, but for me, it is advantage Chelsea.
We would see the full story after 90mins.
Cheers