What To Do About Climate Change: Be Happy And Plant Some Trees

in #hive-1230463 years ago

Once again, just like every week, it's time for a QOTW by @ecotrain, and this time I want to submit an answer too. The topic for this week is something I have a bit of a strong opinion on: What Things Could We Do Differently To Reduce Climate Change? So please bear with me as I bare my soul in this regard.


image source

Change the Things You Cannot Accept, and Accept the Things You Cannot Change.

Oh yeah, and most importantly: know the difference! Because as vital as this issue is, I believe there is a great deal of smoke and mirrors related to it, and while I don't want to deny the science, I think much of this same information is being used against us. So let me start at the actual increase of temperatures today.

As I am aware of it, today's warming is not the result of the current carbon emissions, but it goes back ... like 2-3 decades. Even if my numbers are wrong, I'm pretty certain it didn't happen just last year. In other words, we'd have to reduce the emissions from back then to curb today's temperature rise. Even if we completely stopped emitting carbon into the atmosphere right this minute, the following decades would still experience the warming resulting from the last decades. As horrible as it all sounds, trying to reduce the present warming is a bit like crying over the extinction of the mastodon. I know, I too think it's a tragedy, but that giant beast died out thousands of years ago. Let's get over it, shall we?


image source

But We Can't Just Let Things Go On Like This!

I agree, we should not watch idly while this beautiful world is being sliced to bits and cooked in its own juice. And since we can't push the carbon emissions back into the 90's where they came from, we must look ahead and see what we can do differently. The problem is, most of human activity results in emitting CO2 into the atmosphere. Cooking food, staying warm, moving from place to place, producing food to cook, distributing it, etc. Of course, there are better and worse ways to go about doing all of these things, but since the factors are so numerous and complex, focusing only on one issue at the expense of all the others is not only foolish, but manipulative.


image source

Take eating meat (or not) as an example. Certainly cattle contribute to the emission of methane, a gas with much worse effects on the atmosphere than CO2. But switching to a plant based diet does not resolve the problem of CO2 emissions from tilling the land. Also, the processing and distributing has to be factored into the equation. Or let's talk about fossil fuels. Clearly, I'm not a fan of them either. But changing to electric will increase the demand on batteries and thus the mining for rare materials required for them. Again, not a real viable alternative. On the downside, all of these ideas necessitate a large-scale collective effort, get everyone (always with exceptions!) to make considerable sacrifices, and in the end is not even guaranteed to work. At what scale does the war in Ukraine contribute to climate change? Or how about the last volcanic eruption?

Everybody Sweep In Front Of Their Own House

My biggest beef with climate effort, or people who advocate for it in a loud fashion, is that it tries to rally everyone together behind one idea(l). At first harmlessly by reasoning, but since that is always an exercise in futility, eventually coercion. And as good as their intentions may be, I really do not like being coerced. I have always seen myself as an environmentalist, and I think I've done my fair share to making this world a better place. Some of the things I pride myself on, for whatever it's worth, are never having owned a car, and never having invested in the stock market. And if I decide to go vegan, it should be my own choice and no one else's. Otherwise let me have my bacon, after all I never bothered those who would not want any.


image source

On the other hand, there is tons we can do against climate change, that doesn't involve forcing others to change their behavior. Planting a tree is the first good step. But that is clearly not enough: the young sapling needs to be tended, protected from getting chewed up, pushed over, or trampled down. Making sure it has sufficient water and mulch is important, so you should be there to protect it during its first years. While you're doing that, you may as well plant a perennial garden around it, creating a plant community that will help it grow, and also supply food for you. You may as well bring in some animals to fertilize the soil, mow the abundant growth, and sure ... you can even eat some of them. Since this way you're cutting out the entire transport and processing network, you are reducing your carbon footprint much more effectively than if had just gone vegan or bought an electric car.

Most importantly, however, stop worrying about the rest! You're doing your part, that's what's important. Meanwhile there's nothing you can do about the volcano. Let the volcano belch out its toxic chemicals, just like all those bombs exploding in other places. Let others eat their meat and drive their diesel trucks. Don't worry about them. It's much better for your own mental health, as well as for that of others.

Sort:  

You have nice ideas and perceptions about saving the environment even though you will do it your own way and conditions. I feel the same too!

23tGXZkQoLUXwgqBduahB1LsiD7goYLrgpBghyQ5hKfNC3Y4igPrrJLdBdkGTho7L6tyb.png

Yes, I'm sure most of us do. So the most sensible approach is to let each one of us do it our own way. I believe it can work. And if not? Well, in that case I doubt any other way will.

Your content has been voted as a part of Encouragement program. Keep up the good work!

Use Ecency daily to boost your growth on platform!

Support Ecency
Vote for new Proposal
Delegate HP and earn more

Interestingly, though planting trees is a beautiful symbolic gesture, planting trees isn't the panacea that its cracked up to be.

Well, my point here is is, that since you have to take care of the young tree, you may as well plant a garden around it. Since you have to be there to tend the garden, you may as well grow a farm around it.

I got your point about taking it further and you are right, we need to see tree planting as developing an ecosystem rather than individual trees.

Exactly! And as custodians of that ecosystem we ourselves will become part of it. And THAT, I believe is what really makes a difference. But I suppose I should have expanded on this idea more, and made it more explicit. Thanks for pointing it out, btw. 😀

No worries, though I don't see us as custodians of ecosystems, we need to recognise more that we are a part, a component, a system within systems of many ecosystems and not see ourselves as outside of any part of it all. It's, for want of a better word, holographic. Interestingly, 'ecosystem' is a word that I see bandied about online a lot, especially when talking about decentralisation. Nature is truly decentralised.

!luv

Most importantly, however, stop worrying about the rest! You're doing your part, that's what's important. Meanwhile there's nothing you can do about the volcano. Let the volcano belch out its toxic chemicals, just like all those bombs exploding in other places. Let others eat their meat and drive their diesel trucks. Don't worry about them. It's much better for your own mental health, as well as for that of others.

You summarized this topic well. When it comes to how we can contribute towards making the world a better place especially when it comes to taking care of the environment, you will see different opinion of which some are pointing to the same thing but through different approach. What is necessary then is for us to access our opinion with the obvious facts. For example, we know very well that burning of woods to produce charcoal for other need is not healthy, we should thus try as much as possible to desist from it. However, we should discriminate others who may not see such act to be harmful. We may try to educate them but never to be bothered that out little effort is not contributing anything since there are still others who are taking actions that is destroying the environment.

Your post align so well with #word power : dialectical ( relating to logical discussing of ideas and opinion )

Your content has also been curated by a vyb team member . keep writing and using our tags.

JOSEPH.jpg

Thanks for the curation! Indeed, it's easy to become fanatic when it comes to such an all-encompassing issue such as climate change. But due to its complexity it should not be reduced to a handful of factors, especially viewed in isolation. You could see this on the example of Covid, while that does not even approach the climate issue in complexity.

Really liking what you have to say about planting a tree being not nearly enough. Yes, it's a beginning.

Worry about YOU. Driving a diesel truck? Guilty. It's the only kind viable up here in the mountains and we need one for our business. Sigh.

Nice! Sometimes I'm not sure if I manage to get my point across, but comments like this one show my that I do. :-) Exactly: things are way more complex than to be reduced to independent factors. Thanks for pointing out the diesel truck! I guess we're all "guilty" of something if we reduce things to mere factors...