— VerifyYourBrain

They make it appear as if Hive is the reason Splinterlands has been laid back, or that SPS is bleeding as a result of Hive.

This is like having a bad marriage, and couples, before getting divorced, blame each other for whose fault was it... While both parties were responsible for their actions... The same goes for Splinterlands and HIVE... Nobody was pointing fingers when SPL had millions of income in the bull market...

Long story short, I think that this would be the appropriate moment to pull out the "decentralized" card on the table and leave this decision to the SPS stakers if Splinterlands wants to keep a decentralized game image... This shouldn't be Matt's decision, but the biggest stakers decision...

You and I could argue if something is good or bad, but if we want to move things in a decentralized world, we should have a bigger stake... If not, we can share our opinions, and not be angry if the "story" doesn't go in the direction we want... It should go where the biggest stakers (or majority) want... That's how it should work... :)

I have picked this post on behalf of the @OurPick project! Check out our Reading Suggestions Posts!

Please consider voting for our Liotes HIVE Witness. Thank you!

Sort:

Trending

[-]

josediccus 2 months ago

You're right, having a voice and a stake can easily decide this. Decentralization makes it so, that the people with bigger stake have the bigger voice. In this case I actually think the blame games are just not good
As you've said no one was blaming Hive when SPS was booming in 2021,but simply saying splinterlands should rage quit is incredible saddening.

The proposal will eventually pass which is good, because we have more people who believe splinterlands needs to stay up. However it raises the question as to whether quitting will always come into mind when things aren't going well.

Thanks for the Curation

0.09 VYB

1 vote