Green Transportation: Is One Car Enough for a Family?

in #hive-1538502 days ago


MINIGREENTRANSPORTATIONISONEONECARENOUGH.png


Small changes, big impact.

This is a publication based on the suggested topic proposed in the Hive Learners community through their discord, which on this occasion is "One Car Per Family".

I will distribute 3% of the rewards obtained in this post, among the best comments, who will receive a tip when the rewards are collected.


DIVISORFIRMAHIVE502.png

"The Earth has enough for everyone's need, but not for everyone's greed."
<< Mahatma Gandhi >>




DIVISORFIRMAHIVE502.png


greentransportation1.jpeg
Bing AI

Welcome to my blog. Today's topic invites us to discuss having only one car per family and the implications this brings are really very varied.

On the one hand, having only one vehicle per family means that the whole family must be transported with that vehicle.

Understanding that the family nucleus is generally made up of two children, the father, and the mother. Today, taking into account that we are referring to a small family nucleus, the father would have to take each of the children to their place of study, to their school.

Suppose, in this case, each one attends a different school, so he would have to travel to two different places and then he would have to travel to take his wife to her work and finally, he should travel to his workplace.

This implies a long expenditure of time throughout the process, a large amount of accumulated stress because trying to get to each place on time causes stress both in the driver and in the family member.

Furthermore, let's also take into account that fuel and resources such as the car's tires are being consumed.

So, taking into account this negative aspect and also mentioning that the environment is being polluted with carbon emissions, the carbon dioxide emitted by the vehicle, and the noise pollution from the car's noise, the horns, and all that.


DIVISORFIRMAHIVE502.png


greentransportation2.jpeg
Bing AI

So, on this side, we are destroying the ozone layer, we are polluting the planet at the cost of making these people's lives easier, so that everyone can get to their school and work on time.

But if we review the history of the world, at the beginning of the world in the age of the dinosaurs, of course, there were no means of transportation, there were no vehicles, there was no pollution.

However, humans evolved and created their means of transportation.

They invented the wheel and with the wheel, through carriages, we moved from one place to another. There was no pollution in the sense that carriages did not emit carbon gases.

So, I believe the solution to this is not to have a law to have one vehicle per household but to create a law in which carbon emissions are not so high and regulate that people do not pollute the environment.

So, I believe the ideal here would be for vehicles to have some sort of filter so that the environment is not polluted and that people would not have the need to have only one vehicle per family, they could have more vehicles and also regulate the use of these vehicles to avoid transportation problems and the queues that can form and currently form in different countries.

Because we must also see that this regulation can come not only from the side of pollution but from the side of the amount of traffic that is fostered and created in the streets.


DIVISORFIRMAHIVE502.png


greentransportation3.jpeg
Bing AI

So, my thoughts on this matter are that there has to be a regulation to limit or rationally use vehicles in case there is more than one vehicle per family and also place these filters on these vehicles.

I also believe that a very important factor is to educate people about the sustainability of using biodegradable and renewable resources that do not pollute the environment.

A lot of collaboration from people is needed in this regard because the main problem, from my point of view, is that people pollute and because of the large number of vehicles and people having more than one vehicle in their homes, the planet is getting more and more polluted.

We are polluting more and more because we do not realize or do not care that the planet is being polluted if, in the end, we are not going to live or see the future of the planet.

The next generations will see it and precisely because of having this type of mentality, we are harming ourselves.

We must think about the future, we must think about the planet and the legacy that we are leaving, that we will give to those who come after us because perhaps we will not suffer the consequences, but those who come after us will.



DIVISORFIRMAHIVE502.png
This is my black cat "manclar", this account is to honor his dead (it happened years ago).


firmanclaravatar50.png
Visit the Neon Strike discord, the game of the future today! (Discord)


Credits:

Thumbnail image maded using Bing AI and edited with Canva.com
The text dividers were made by me using aseprite
Post translated from spanish to english using Microsoft Copilot

Sort:  

I really liked your post, we must preserve our environment and future generations, we must live and know how to live and protect our planet

We should worry more about the planet that we are leaving to others, but sadly, I observe many people who ignore this, apparently they are too busy with their lives to be able to dedicate time to the future of humanity. It's worrying.

Yes, this is a great truth. We often forget that future generations also have the right to live on this planet of ours.

Those who are children now, I think we have to do the work of educating them, of creating awareness, if we don't, well, we disappear very quickly, I apologize for being fatalistic, but I see with concern how we are slowly becoming extinct.

Hi manclar, my opinion is that the whole development of your ideas in the text starts from a situation that is absurd. And I think the problem is not in the cars, but in that initial absurdity. For what reason, some schools and the workplace are so far away from home that you need to go by car. In Madrid, many people come to work from other provinces every day, why don't they have a job in their place of origin? All this makes no sense to me.

A big hug @manclar.

I understand you 😀, the person in the situation you mention should look for a job or a closer school, or seriously consider living near one, because in this context it would simply not be reasonable to move long distances on foot or by bicycle. I don't know, the world is absurd in itself, and so am I.

I designed the world (it's a secret) and I'm very proud to see how poorly it works. I am a great professional, no doubt.

Surely yes, although since you are the designer of this beautiful and peaceful place where I live, I would like to know what inspired you to create this healthy and beautiful environment that surrounds me. 😂

I dreamt it, a spider came to visit me and said, let's do something big!! and we did it! 🤣

Ah I see, you found yourself with some new entertainment. Wow, interesting, I wonder what “challenge” you currently have in your life. Surely you will find the video that I just recorded right now and will publish tomorrow on YouTube a little entertaining. Don't even think that I'm going to use 3speak hahahaha, no, I reveal myself, my earnings are for me, not for them, damn it 😂

It will probably be very unentertaining, but I'll watch it because I appreciate you. 😃

Yes, I'm sure of that, it's meant to be a filler, like every Tuesday, and like what I do every day, because since I feel so motivated by the way they value my talent here, it moves me to do these great things.

untitled.gif

Hace tiempo me ponía a pensar, en.. que realmente el ser humano es una especie de cáncer para el planeta, es o somos como ese hongo que come sin cesar un depredador insaciable, pero también he reflexionado , que el planeta es un ser vivo , debe tener mecanismo de seguridad para protegerse, pues nosotros, tan suprematicos, pero dependemos del planeta y los animales y plantas sin ellos no podríamos existir, pero el mundo y la naturaleza si puede vivir sin el ser humano. Eso da mucho que pensar

We are the virus that kills the planet, I came to that conclusion many years ago my friend, we only destroy and pollute. And the planet, trying to purge us, does good.

One good rule the government of the world can make is to make public transportation more reliable. I know for a fact that if we had a reliable public transport system, many people won't bother to buy cars. And with more people choosing to travel by bus or trains, there will be less vehicles on the road and as such, less pollution

But they are not going to do it because they would lose a lot of money in concessions and equipment due to planned obsolescence, and their business would be ruined. But in an ideal world they should offer quality subway and surface transportation systems, as they do in Taiwan, and the other large technological metropolises.

Well, we've seen clearly that these guys don't give a damn about us, and anything they do is only towards their own ends. Just pathetic.

They are psychopaths, and as long as the population is not educated to combat them, we will have a world with people who follow the herd. More people are needed with critical thinking, capable of promoting a productive society, who combat these sick systems.

One car per family should be enough, but it depends on how good public transport is in your city. In my case, going to work in a private car is about 30 minutes versus 75 minutes by train (per 2 if you count the return journey home).
It is cheaper to travel by train than by car, but these extra 90 minutes of personal time per day are very valuable.
And yes, I would prefer to be able to use public transport to go to work, read a book and not have the problems of driving on some high density roads.