Hi,
today we have a proposal on Splinterlands, where it is voted that the land survey shall be introduced to improve the land.
I voted fully against it, and why you should also. As I have 1 tract, which translates into 100 plots.
I think this is another way to take money from the players without defining even what people will get instead.
Here are some reasons, besides the new opportunity to spend money:
- at the time the land was sold, there was no discussion about the potions
- it is a forced expense, as people who invested, don't want to have the purchase degraded
- there is no explanation on the rarities and availability of those
- we don't know what influence it has
- we don't know if it is worth to pay for each land 10000 DEC
- it is like asking for additional money for a product that has been sold
- team does not have a clue on what they are selling the extra tax:
- it is like asking for additional money for a product that has been sold
- it will drop the SPS price again, as most will unstake and sell it for DEC
- money sinks can be done much easier with expensive buildings on the land plots
Here are some proposals to make it a better version, if this nonsense get's approved:
- the 10k DEC shall be seen as credit for the building upgrades on the land
- bring the land economics in the next days out, before the proposal vote expires
- If regions and tracts are split, let people have the benefit of having the same value for tracts, now the single plot owners are screwed, as the guarantee goes only to tracts and above.
- deliver first, and after that ask for money
I'm not complaining about Splinterlands in general, only about this proposal, which is again a method to milk investors, to fix an error, that players are not responsible for.
If you would like to play the game, give it a try at Splinterlands.
If you want to automate some of your Splinterlands activities, like renting, try Splex.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta