It burns very little between 0-60 km / h and accelerates well. There are several reasons for this.
The engines of 1.0 engine vehicles are small, connecting rod, piston diameter, stroke distance are short, compression ratio is relatively high, operating temperature is relatively high. it has both pros and cons.
The optimum point of most 1.0 engine curves is the 1,500-3,000 rpm range. because these engines can produce 110 horsepower from 1l volume, mostly with forced filling, that is, turbo. This adds a complex and sensitive machine such as a turbo to the engine. If its lubrication is not effective, you will take it in your lap.
In addition, these motors do not suffer much from their rated load. - sure speakers will read here and comment stupidly in my message box-
The thermodynamically done boundary work is expressed in p.dv. A 1.6l engine producing 110 horsepower is not the same as a 1 liter engine producing 110 horsepower. The smaller one has to work at higher pressure and temperature to get the same power. It is an indisputable fact of this material science that if you make this a habit and drive constantly on intercity roads, effects such as metal fatigue and wear will wear out your engine more. Of course, 1.6 engines were produced with old technology and materials, current 1.0 engines are produced with more innovative and durable materials.
If you want economy, 1.0 provides without spoiling your driving experience too much. However, if you are asking whether I will print my code or sit, vehicles below 2.0 will not cut it, let's not deceive ourselves now.
