xPolyCUB - Use Your Governance Vote. NOW!

in #hive-1679223 years ago

PolyCUB is the newest addition to the CUB Defi family. Polygon CUB extends the ecosystem from Binance Smart Chain to Polygon.

An allocation is dropped to holders of CUB over a period of 60 days. The token is currently experiencing a rapid inflation phase. Initial inflation started out at 5 PolyCUB per block (every 2 seconds) and already dropped to 1 tokens per block. Emissions will stay at 1 CUB per block for 1 more week.


Governance Vote

The latest feature is the use of xPolyCUB as governance token:
Introducing xPOLYCUB Governance | First Vote: Reduce the Locked Claim "Power Down" Window.

The first voting window is closing in a few hours.

@onealfa created a post about the state of voting yesterday:
Let your voice be heard
Voting participation at the time of his writing was still low. Only 73 votes were cast. Now there are 78 votes cast, out of a total of 554 potential voters (14%).


Looking at Numbers

One special feature is the option to stake PolyCUB in order receive xPolyCUB. xPolyCUB receives inflation and 50% of the early harvesting haricut.

The growth of staked PolyCUB has been slowing down:

220424_xPoly_Poly.png

xPolyCUBGrowth xPolyCUBstaked PolyCUBGrowth staked PolyCUB
13.03.20221180391155480
20.03.2022147146125 %2143376185 %
27.03.2022165587113%2946201137%
03.04.20221746385%341484416%
10.04.20221820714%36596107%
17.04.20221855632%37995594%
24.04.20221895492%39231943%

Ratio of staked PolyCUB to xPolyCUB:

220424_pc_xpc_ratio.png

Top 50 accounts ordered by percentage:

220424_xPolyCUB_top50.png

As of April 24th, total PolyCUB supply is 5'369'497. Of those, 73% is staked in the xPolyCUB vault, which is an equivalent of 1'059'262 Total Value Locked (TVL) in the xPolyCUB vault:

220424_poly_TVL.png

Price of PolyCUB and xPolyCUB over time:

220424_price_xpoly_poly.png

Data taken during airdrop claims.

Stake Distribution

Account classification

  • Whale = Accounts holding > 1% of total supply.
  • Investor = Accounts holding between 0.1% to 1% of total supply.
  • Retail = Accounts below 0.1% of total supply.

Whale Domination describes the share of tokens whales hold.

A few tokens for comparison:

TokenDomination [%]
DASH4
ETH14
HIVE40
DOGE45
BTC63
VET74

Distribution as of April 17th:

Whale Domination %Investor %Retail %
70.6822.46.92

A whale domination percentage of 71% is extremely top heavy, but it is early times and domination has been dropping from 76%.

Out of a total of 554 xPolyCUB addresses there are:

# Whales > 1900 xPolyCUB# Investors# Retail < 190 xPolyCUB
1979456

xPolyCUB distribution across accounts:

MaxMean3rd QuartileMedian1st Quartile
25378.463504.16100.0018.673.82

The extremely large difference between mean and median balance shows a strong concentration of assets in the top quartile. Although still very lopsided, the distribution is slowly improving, which can be observed by the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index (HHI):

220424_xpoly_hhi_line.png

The HHI is a measure of industry concentration or competitiveness. Increases in the Herfindahl index indicate a decrease in competition. The scale ranges from 0 (highly competitive) to 1 (monopoly).


Data source: polygonscan.com


Vote for my witness: @blue-witness

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

Sort:  

This is good information on polycub. The polycub addresses distribution is interesting !

Governance !BEER

Only about 14% voted. Wonder if the others will do it in the last minutes, probably not.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

There might be some opinionated whales sitting one the fence right now and about to drop a late vote. That's about it. And their wisdom will determine the outcome of this vote.

Oh, sorry, I can't believe I missed your reply. And yes, there were not much who voted on the last minute.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

Maybe while the price drop is because of the bearish trend we are seeing since last week.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

How is it that only 78 people out of 554 voted for this? Seems strange, are there really that many not paying attention to their funds?

Thanks for that info

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

I think it was rather unexpected and a short timeframe. Maybe it caught people by surprise. Let's hope the next governance action receives more attention.

Been following the AMAs religiously lately. I guess you're right, it was a short time frame.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

I can understand why the bottom 454 wallets did not care to vote. Tiny holdings, tiny influence.

Byt why so many are missing form the TOP-100 ( or even TOP-50) stake holders - is still a mystery to me.

I guess so, without any influence votes don't count for much.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

This post has been manually curated by @bhattg from Indiaunited community. Join us on our Discord Server.

Do you know that you can earn a passive income by delegating your Leo power to @india-leo account? We share 100 % of the curation rewards with the delegators.

Please contribute to the community by upvoting this comment and posts made by @indiaunited.

i think the voting has been low considering the process of voting isn't so straightforward. However, it is just a one-time thing so I can cut leofinance some slack. I will throw in my vote now

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

Don't bother voting now. Window is closed and it is now a 30 day lock-up period.
One reason for low participation could be that it was new and somewhat unexpected, another that the UI wasn't ready and the process was a little laborious.

Don't bother voting now. Window is closed and it is now a 30 day lock-up period.

oops. I just did

One reason for low participation could be that it was new and somewhat unexpected, another that the UI wasn't ready and the process was a little laborious.

yeah, I think we will have more participants once the UI is ready for the next proposal.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

Here are the inofficial results:

https://leofinance.io/@roleerob/demographics-of-polycub-s-1st-vote

https://leofinance.io/@onealfa/changes-to-polycub-coming-soon

I guess Khal will announce it officially tomorrow during the AMA

How was is "not so straightforward"?

Send a TX to the governance address with the exact amount below:
Send 0.0009 MATIC to keep the claim window at 90 days
Send 0.0003 MATIC to reduce to 30 Days
Send 0.00015 MATIC to reduce to 15 Days
Governance Address: 0x2CAA7b86767969048029c27C1A62612c980eB4b8

From Leofinance's post: Introducing xPOLYCUB Governance | First Vote: Reduce the Locked Claim "Power Down" Window

I don't know, seemed pretty easy to me.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta


Hey @bluerobo, here is a little bit of BEER from @isnochys for you. Enjoy it!

Learn how to earn FREE BEER each day by staking your BEER.

Good stats collection my friend

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

Whales keep buying and weekend farmers keep selling... A lot of people will be butthurt when the price starts picking up the pace but this is just a natural cycle in crypto. Those with conviction always win the race.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

the vote was proposed with no real discussion of how the change in lock up period would affect the PolyCUB ecosystem. How can you vote on something when you don't fully understand what affects will come from the change? Very few people can really effectively explain xPolyCub even at this point. There needs to be a lot more time for discussion prior to future governance votes in order to allow some discussion of the pros and cons of future votes.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

It felt a little rushed. That is true.

In fact - your mentioned things seem valid.
But...
The effect of lock-up period length to the whole platform is not so huge it should be prior discussed for a long time, and much effort be given that everyone understands it to the very bottom.

We will see now how this change will play.
If needed - everyone can raise some argumented concerns, and initiate a new change, new vote