Know It All: Thinking You Know is Worse Than Not Knowing

in #hive-1679222 years ago

knownothingjonsnowgot.jpg

Last night I was alerted by @cflclosers that HBD was spiking again.

What a nice guy, alerting me to these things.
He did it last time as well.
I made money both times because of it.
I probably wouldn't have noticed.

In any case...

  • I made my first ever HIVE >> HBD conversion last night.
  • First, I powered up my excess Hive to a rounded number.
    • Everything over 3000 Hive, just for easier tracking.
  • Second I made the conversion for 1000 Hive (2000 remaining).
    • I received HBD instantly and dumped back for 271.4 Hive.
      • In 3 days, my 1000 Hive collateral will be returned to me.
        • Minus 5% fee minus value of the HBD I converted.
  • Need 428.6 Hive returned to me in 3 days to break even.
    • Anything extra is profit.

Why bring this up?

Because I THOUGHT I understood how the conversion mechanism worked, but I absolutely did not understand it, which really threw me on tilt the last time HBD was pumped. I thought I understood how it worked, and I made foolish decisions based on that bad information. I could have made a lot more money last time around if I knew that the conversion happens instantly and we instantly get HBD for it. It's a very interesting system. I know I talked trash about it last time but... it's pretty smart. Just complicated (ish). But like all things Hive now that I understand it, it becomes simple and easy. Funny how that works.

image.png

Classic Know-It-All

We've all experienced people that want to be the smartest person in the room. They never admit when they are wrong, and rather than admit they don't know something, they'll just make something up on the fly that sounds right. It's not a very good strategy for improvement, and only serves to peacock to the people around in hopes that this behavior somehow boosts one's reputation. Except... nobody likes a know-it-all, so I'm fairly certain this is a strategy that fails most of the time. Not sure why so many choose to employ it (likely a fear-based strategy).

image.png

Even the term "mansplain" came about because men employ this behavior far more often than woman... and end up being know-it-alls around women that actually know the topic much better than they do. I've seen it happen many times... it's... embarrassing to say the least. Of course terms like this, just like all left-wing politics these days, has been kicked up to 11 and are greatly overused inappropriately. Now any man explaining any topic is "mansplaining" regardless of the context or the tone. But that's a completely off-topic separate political post.

knowmorestarshiptroopersnumbersgame.jpg

The best way to learn new things and make improvement is to not only fail, but admit failure. I suppose society itself makes this a difficult thing to do. No one wants to admit fault or imperfection. There's a certain punishment that comes along with that, and no one wants to bear the brunt of that weight that society itself places on us. Just another classic example of how toxic modern society is and how much room for improvement humanity has left to achieve. I often talk about how we are operating on less than 1% efficiency, but it's possible that even that is overexaggerating the reality of the situation.

Other examples of Know-it-all behavior:

This happens all the time in crypto because crypto is so new and contrary to every other capitalistic trend out there.

Economists

Never listen to a self-proclaimed expert economist when it comes to crypto. They have no idea what they are talking about. Anyone can guess better than they can, because their education only works (poorly) within the current economy. Because crypto is the opposite of the current economy, they're bound to extrapolate all the wrong information and come to all the wrong conclusions.

VENTURECAPITAL.png

Venture Capitalists

These people are the worst. They think tech can't grow without them. They want to move in and claim ownership, and then extract maximum gains if the project succeeds. Considering only 1 in 10 projects are expected to succeed, they are looking to extract x100 what they put into a project that does make it.

In crypto, this means that every single project that has venture capital funding is basically doomed to be gimped until VCs have finally cashed out. SOL is number one on my shitlist in this regard. Just like LUNA, I haven't even done any research on it just because of the VC mania surrounding the project. Doesn't matter that it's in the top ten market cap (in fact that makes it worse). This chain is owned by VCs, making it dead on arrival (or ten years away from true decentralization).

Listening to a VC is like listening to Jim Cramer. Shark Tank? Mark Cuban? Do yourself a favor and just bet against everything they do. You can thank me later. These people are clueless and end up leveraging their own wealth to convince people they are smart. They are surrounded by yes-men and have no idea how full of it they are. Don't fall into the same trap they've built for themselves.

Banks

Just look at what bankers are trying to do with crypto. Wow, so smart bro. Just recreate the same exact system you already have... that doesn't work. Brilliant. Again, classic know-it-all syndrome. Banks could make trillions of dollars from this movement, but they have zero innovation and refuse to give up power in exchange for the value this would create.

Politicians

Show me a single politician that has the same ideals of a grassroots crypto movement. These people simply do not exist. The entire concept runs contrary to consolidating power and leveraging that power for self-gain. This is the definition of what politicians do. Crypto does not compute.

Ladder Anxiety

Fear of failure is a universal fear that extends into every activity we do. Some activities are more stressful than others. Whether it be competitive video games, public speaking, or just being in a room with other people, our ego and perception of ourselves is important, but can easily be taken to toxic show-boating levels, or even worse: crippling fear. This is the same kind of fear that can lead to being a know-it-all. Everyone wants to be the best without having to fail over and over again before they get there. That's not how life works. That's not how mastery works. Fake it till you make it, amirite?

Ass u me

They say when you assume you make an 'ass' out of 'u' and 'me'. Of course that's not always true, and sometimes we are forced to extrapolate and make guesses. We can't learn or grow without making mistakes. We can't be expected to know everything and have all the experience in the world when starting something new. Failure is unavoidable; it's how we deal with that failure that matters. Grace is required for maximum gain. Stay based.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

Sort:  

The people are waking up to crapitalism and its intentions.

image.png
source

It appears to me that buying on the internal market during price spikes is the best stategy.

Capitalism doesn't even exist, let alone holds aims and intention.

It appears to me that buying on the internal market during price spikes is the best stategy.

Are you suggesting profiting from the buying and selling?

When crapitalism is forced upon you there is little choice but to profit from buying and selling.
IF I am going to be forced to live in a crapitalust's world, then I am going to do what they do to make the money I need to eat.
I see nothing wrong or contradictory about that policy.

IF you want to talk about alternatives to crapitalistic domination of economics we can do that.

But, as long as I am forced to pay to live, then I will do what I have to do to survive in the dystopia I find myself in.

Capitalism doesn't exist. Its a Socialist term invented and used to maintain the fiction that Free Markets are inherently immoral and unjustifiable.

What about the term “capitalism”? Interestingly, although the Industrial Revolution (beginning in the mid-18th century) demonstrated capitalism at work, the term wasn’t coined or used until the mid-19th century. Even Adam Smith (1723–1790)—the father of political economy, first systematic expositor of the workings of free markets, and author of An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776)—did not use the term “capitalism.” The closest he came was to endorse what he called “the obvious and simple system of natural liberty.” Likewise, prominent philosophers and economists who issued widely-read treatises in the decades surrounding Smith’s 1776 book (e.g., David Hume, Thomas Malthus, Jean-Baptiste Say, James Mill, David Ricardo, J.R. McCullough, J.S. Mill) discussed “capital” and “capitalists,” but not “capitalism.”
..
Many writers preceded Marx in using the term “capitalism,” and of course, many used it after him. However, it has primarily been used by anti-capitalists. Thus, historically the use of the term “capitalism” has been shaped largely by those who, at best, misunderstood the system or, at worst, understood it but deliberately mischaracterized it in order to attack a straw-man version of it. In 1861, French socialist Pierre Proudhon used the term to describe an “economic and social regime in which capital, the source of income, does not generally belong to those who make it work through their labor.”8 In What is Property? (1840), Proudhon claimed that property is, per se, “theft.” Like Marx, he gave capitalism a nefarious connotation.

https://theobjectivestandard.com/2018/11/the-mind-based-etymology-of-capitalism/

But, as long as I am forced to pay to live, then I will do what I have to do to survive in the dystopia I find myself in.

Does that include lying, cheating, stealing and killing?

I prefer hard labor and trading on the markets personally.

I have yet to have anybody dispute the math in chapter 9 of this book.
What we have is the intentional design of the system.

Trading your labor for money is theft though! Math has no value in this, at all. This is a fundamental matter of ethics. You consider working for money unethical. That is the Crux of the matter.

Only in a fiat environment, with sound money the argument becomes academic.
No longer can the banksters get labor for nothing while debasing everybody else's savings.

It's not academic argument, it's a property rights and moral/ethical dilemma of "being forced to pay with money".

You're shaking your fist at the bankers who have little to nothing to do with the economic policies that are handed down from the legislative branch.

Not theft, exploitation.
I have no money to steal, but I can be exploited for my labor by someone with alot of money.

shakes fist

ITS NOT THEFT, ITS UNDERVALUING!

I think its theft, whichever way you slice it, if it smells like theft, tastes like theft and quaks like theft, its probably not exploitation, but theft.

Exploitation is when you place a worm on a hook to catch a fish. Its also using that fish to bait a bigger fish with.

exploitation (n.)
1803, "productive working" of something, a positive word among those who used it first, though regarded as a Gallicism, from French exploitation, noun of action from exploiter (see exploit (v.)). Bad sense developed 1830s-50s, in part from influence of French socialist writings (especially Saint Simon), also perhaps influenced by use of the word in U.S. anti-slavery writing; and exploitation was hurled in insult at activities it once had crowned as praise.

What are you? A slave? A worm? A fish?!

15k bitcoin?

1,6 was the point i hit. so i could buy hive for 0,4HBD :D

but fuck, only had 100 liquid...

single politician

El Salvador President?

What an interesting post, day by day I see how much I still need to understand in the operation of our network

!1UP

You can earn passive income by delegation of tribe tokens to "The Cartel".

image.png
Click this banner to join "The Cartel" discord server to know more.

I enjoyed reading up your article, that was a great effort you put. Thanks for sharing

Ladder Anxiety! My favorite post!

We can't learn or grow without making mistake

untitled.gif

Rich Dad Poor Dad

This One of the first books I read on financial freedom. And the author said he always wanted to be the least smartest person in the room, so he could learn from everyone. It still holds true today, surround yourself with people who have knowledge you don’t have, so you can learn. That’s a big strength of this community, the knowledge which is given freely.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

1UP-PIZZA.png

You have received a 1UP from @kwskicky!

The @oneup-cartel will soon upvote you with:
@leo-curator, @vyb-curator, @pob-curator, @pal-curator
And they will bring !PIZZA 🍕.

Learn more about our delegation service to earn daily rewards. Join the Cartel on Discord.


The rewards earned on this comment will go directly to the people( @johndieo ) sharing the post on Twitter as long as they are registered with @poshtoken. Sign up at https://hiveposh.com.

Thanks for the shout-out. I never know what to do during chaos but I know you do and always think to alert you.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

Congratulations @edicted! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s):

You got more than 27500 replies.
Your next target is to reach 28000 replies.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Check out the last post from @hivebuzz:

The Hive community is in mourning. Farewell @erikasue!
Level up your NFTs and continue supporting the victims of war

Second I made the conversion for 1000 Hive (2000 remaining).

I received HBD instantly and dumped back for 271.4 Hive.

I don't get it...
500Hive (from the 1000) in HBD and that HBD instantly dumped back into Hive
and you only get 271.4 Hive?

shouldnt it be more than 500 hive? (of the 1000?)

Ug is that what I said?
It was 571.