Hive: The Grass Is Always Greener

in #hive-1679228 months ago

It seems a lot of people on Hive have the idea the grass is always greener elsewhere.

For years, people have pointed to everything that is wrong with Hive. Of course, if you disagree, then you are nothing more than a seller of hopium.

The whales are greedy. Our tokenomics is broken. We are slow to get things done. Node issues suck. We need more users. More quality content.

Of course, these people also can suffer from the "shiny new thing" syndrome. How many "killers" have we see over the years?

Remember when Dan Larimer rolled out Voice and proclaimed it the killer? What are they now? I ask because both Voice and Larimer are both rarely appear anywhere.

Certainly, when it comes to technology, things fail. Nothing is perfect. This is something that seems lost on many people.

Image by Ideogram

The Grass Isn't Always Greener

Web 3.0, in general, is slow to develop.

There are a few reasons for this. To start, there are really few services offered that people can utilize. People still visit Web 2.0 for their online needs whether it is information, socialization, entertainment, or communication. This is simply the point we are at.

We are also dealing with infrastructure issues.

The Web 2.0 had decades of building. For the most part, Web 3.0 is about 5 years old. Sure, there are some things that started before that but the real thrust was over that recent period. Even still, we are in the very early stages.

Is Hive perfect? No. Far from it. But that is true for everything.

One thing Hive does have going for it is the Lindy Effect. This is an observation that the longer a technology, or system, is around, the longer it has ahead of it. Again, look at all that came and went over the years when it comes to Web 3.0.

How many times have we seen people rush to "the next big thing" in crypto, only to see it fail. Larimer and Voice sure did get a lot of attention at the time.

What happened? Hive keeps plugging along.

Better Technology

The best technology doesn't always win.

This is something that is commonly stated. To substantiate it, many point to the VHS-Beta situation. Unfortunately, this skews the reality as pointing to the outlier always does.

In reality, the better technology almost always wins. Naturally, "better" is a relative term which could alter which fits that description.

Google was simply better search. Windows was a better OS for the masses. Android was the beter application for mobile phones.

Contained in the idea of "better" are factors such as cost, ease of use, scalability, and features. When it comes to Web 3.0, Hive is still far ahead of the field.

As we move through 2024, how many blockchains have no direct transaction fees? Of the ones people mention daily, that still doesn't exist. This causes a major problem when it comes to services.

Another issue is what is in the database of the other chains. If we are truly moving into an AI world, that is a question of paramount importance.

Services

What is the biggest hole in Hive?

Simply, it is a lack of services. This could be applied to all of Web 3.0 but there is a reason for that elsewhere.

Unless the transaction fee issue is resolved, services are going to be lacking on most chains. We will see the emergence of financial services since tx fees are part of that world. However, other services will not occur.

Consider the list above:

  • information
  • socialization
  • entertainment
  • communication

How much of that is going to occur if each time something is placed on chain, there is a direct fee? Even at a penny, who is going to pay that? The answer is evident in the lack of services offered.

Of course, there are some "Web3" services appearing, but they are based upon the server-client architecture, meaning it is really Web 2.0. Jack Dorsey seemed to like this tactic.

Technology doesn't sell because the masses are not drawn to it. They are attracted to services they utilize. When that is met, they will start to adopt something different.

Ultimately, people aren't going to care about any of this. Most will not dive that deep. They do not focus upon better technology, only services they find appealing. This is where the crux of Web 3.0 is going to have to come from.

Hence, we harken back to the infrastructure issues. It is often impossible to build service platforms without the proper infrastructure. It is the proverbial cart and horse.

But Hive Isn't Growing

Here is the ultimate attack.

Hive isn't growing, hence it is dead.

This starts with the question "based upon what"? Most will point to users. Using this metric, that is accurate. However, is that the only barometer for a digital platform? The answer is no. Unfortunately, it is the one that people most understand.

There are many ways to kick of network effects in addition to users. Certainly, they are an important component to the overall equation but not the only piece.

Of course, there is a reason for this. Without services, users are not going to follow. Those who are trying to attract users without anything to offer are trying to sell vaporware. How successful would Google search be without search? Do you think hundreds of millions would show up each day for a blank page?

Foolish as that sounds, isn't that the case? Come to Hive, except when you need news. Join Hive and communicate except when you want to do that directly, then catch us on X or join our Discord.

Services are an issue.

That aside, that does not mean Hive isn't growing. In fact, there are many ways that it is. Each day, more data is being pushed into the database. Do you think this is unimportant in the age of AI? Also, we see more algorithms showing up. This is another important component in the AI world.

Then we have features. This is slower than most would like but, even this week, PeakD rolled out polls that can be used not only on that UI, but could be adopted by others.

Builders

The question is not where are the users? To me, at this point, the more important one is where are the builders?

Here is where Web 3.0, in general, is lacking. Crypto is overwhelmingly market watchers and green candle people as compared to those implementing true business ideas.

Until the latter grows, things will be slow to move forward.

That said, for anyone who thinks the grass is greener elsewhere, he or she is free to leave. Voice. Noisecash. Heck, I can't remember all the supposed "killers" that were promoted as the next big thing.

Yet, somehow, Hive keep plugging along.


What Is Hive

Posted Using InLeo Alpha

Sort:  

Crypto is overwhelmingly market watchers and green candle people as compared to those implementing true business ideas. This is part of the reasons web3 is having slow growth. The market seems to be a trap.

If services could be introduced into the chain the problem of users will be curbed. Meaning all hands must be on deck. Yet the question remains, who is ready?

Services always follow infrastructure. That is something to keep in mind.

The question is not where are the users? To me, at this point, the more important one is where are the builders? --Ultimately, the focus shifts to the need for builders and developers within the Web 3.0 space to drive innovation and progress. Despite the challenges, Hive continues to persevere, showcasing its resilience amidst evolving landscapes and competing platforms.

It is greener, where you have no expectations how green it should be. 🎤

I think hive.blog will be adopted by more people in 2024 because it has some features which web 2.0 does not offer.

Your insights into the developmental stages of technology are spot on. Rome wasn't built in a day, and neither will the infrastructure for Web 3.0. It's crucial to remember that progress is often incremental, with setbacks and obstacles along the way.

Is voice even around anymore? 😂 While it's not all rainbow and sunshine and there's plenty of opinions floating around etc. Hive has done a rather good job overall. This low action though in this bull market does have me a little worried though that it's quickly falling off the radar of the mass of blockchains.

This is a huge concern because we keep slipping down the marketcap rankings. I mean 169M marketcap for the whole thing isn’t very spectacular. Honestly not looking great at all for the bear market as we watch other tokens and coins pump like crazy. I see more selling pressure than anything around here, that is for sure.

The engagement levels are what a big part of the issue is. People only want to post and earn, completely forgetting the whole curation and engagement part of it.

I think for hive to reach a more massive number, there needs to be more updates that will encourage that though I believe it will still be seen in the future

I seldom read long form these days. Oh boy, this is a gem! I agree the part you wrote about transaction fees.
Why hasn't Hive been noticed? Maybe with the Maya-based LEODEX, more will come to know Hive.

It is true that even though Web 3 has gained popularity today, we still visit Web 2 for entertainment or socializing or communication. Although Hive is not taking off but hopefully it has included us in a platform where we have freedom as well as an opportunity to earn and through which many are benefiting and benefiting economically.

Does Hive even need to be a big chain? I think it's very hard to compete against those giants, Solana, Ethereum L2s and even Cosmos and their VC funding.

Maybe Hive is destined to stay as a smaller chain focusing on blogging and micro-blogging. Doesn't mean it can't grow though, with more and more inflows coming to crypto in general, everyone can grow but perhaps not against those giants.

There's nothing better, so we should be happy with what we have.

I fully agree. The grass might be greener on the other side is because someone is tending to it. If they worked on their own grass, it will be greener too. I have tried other blockchains and projects, and a lot of them were scams and rugpulls, some couldn't survive the bear market. That is why I value stability and longevity. Hive has been very consistent and they have a lot of good updates coming up.

It is a long term game. The addition of VSC smart contracts is a big step forward.

HIVE works! 95% of crypto and web3 are useless

A good point.

The question is what it is being built for.
#HIVE for whom? For users? For whales? For creators? For freedom?
When I started, I signed up for @ecency because it was the only node that made sense. But the registration process was a real IQ test. More complicated registration was, probably, only on the webmoney and PayPal services 15 years ago. Then I used @somee for a while. But it received minimal involvement. The same story with the #waivio node. No one sees the publications.
A huge problem with HIVE is that no one explains to beginners how it all works. And many things cannot be understood intuitively. I still don't understand some things.

True that, the other day I was asked why we get both Hive and Leo as curation rewards. Tsk! Tsk!

I also don't really understand why usually (I feel like) only half the reward is credited. Perhaps it has something to do with curation.

Half goes to the other account. Its the norm.

This will help: https://jryze.me/hive.
If you do livestreaming this is the place: https://cast.garden/.

What is this link?
I don't actually stream and don't plan on doing so anytime soon. But I draw line art.

The first one is a beginners guide to hive and the second is a live streaming service that is attached to hive.

Our signup has been updated, please check again when you get chance. I hope we are making it easier

Well, maybe I'll try the updated registration if I need to create an account for one of my friends.
Thanks!

Everything made will have flaws and not just in technology, but those of here on Hive have opined and complained a lot about slow developed growth, I think in that case- apart from issues, there should be better services at hand.

Quite in a years time, I personally havent seen anything to be added as features or help users better to grow, communicate, earn a decent and extensive tokens. But look at community models and how they are the same in development and reward pool ?

They arent improving. So if Hive follows the trend of static growth, users seem to lose interest. Whereas, Inleo popped out a brilliant example, it is rebranding and competing in a great way - the results are at hand.

You can feel the threads being added and Leo tokens been hunted and engagement base in the ecosystem.

But still for the matter of infancy of web3 and more way to go, a gentle forgiving can be made anyway.

Reading your post reminds me of this quote:

Bloom where you are planted.