When former President of Indonesia requested proof from OCCRP after being nominated as the most corrupt leader, Jokowi responded calmly by stating that OCCRP's accusations were baseless and lacking evidence. The people of Indonesia strongly reacted to these allegations and vehemently attacked OCCRP for fabricating facts without any concrete proof of Jokowi's corruption. This backlash was fueled by the fact that under Jokowi's leadership, various projects were successfully implemented, such as the acquisition of a 51% stake in Freeport and the establishment of nickel and other natural resource processing facilities including smelters in Indonesia.
Pic : https://jakartaglobe.id/news/jokowi-slams-occrps-corruption-nomination-prove-it
Jokowi's initiatives were met with disapproval from Europe and the US, leading some to argue that OCCRP's claims lacked credibility. The investment in Freeport shares and the development of local processing facilities were seen as strategic moves to enhance Indonesia's economic independence and maximize the benefits from its abundant natural resources. Despite opposition from certain countries, Jokowi's decisions were widely supported by the Indonesian people who saw them as crucial steps towards achieving national development and prosperity.
The controversy surrounding OCCRP's accusations against Jokowi underscored the importance of substantiating claims with verifiable evidence. The lack of proof to support the corruption allegations against Jokowi ultimately diminished OCCRP's credibility in the eyes of many Indonesians. Jokowi's administration's focus on enhancing domestic resource processing capabilities and asserting sovereignty over strategic assets resonated strongly with the populace, further solidifying his reputation as a decisive leader committed to advancing Indonesia's interests.