I think the marcus wahl case is a silly disagreement between client and developer, from what I know (which isn't much), its completely the client's fault
.
If you don't know much, why advise to not pay him back?
.
I think the marcus wahl case is a silly disagreement between client and developer, from what I know (which isn't much), its completely the client's fault
.
.
My understanding of the case is that the client continuously moved the goalposts, and then made a scene to try to get a full refund after lots of work was done.
I have seen several deliverables with regards to this job, which is where my belief that lots of work was done comes from.
When I asked for the complete scrape of the discord chats, so that I could personally make the rebuttle, I never got access to the information.
Then again, if you don't have all the information, as advisor of the project don't advise to not pay back a debtor.
.
And why make it sound like the issue was only the Discord name change and that he'll get paid back?
I still firmly believe that the client should not be paid back based on my understanding of that particular case.
You have shown two comments from people who are not me, so its unclear what you are claiming, but it must not be about me.