Books; A Reflection Of Society, Not A Solution To Its Problems

in #hive-1801643 months ago

I have been a huge fan of books for as long as I can remember. While I can't exactly pinpoint the exact moment I fell in love with reading, I can say for sure that books have been a constant companion since my childhood. Over the years, I have explored various genres; buying books and diving into Ebooks, devouring pages, scrolling through the screen as I squint my eyes, and scribbling notes. I have come to realize something interesting about my reading habits. Just like the wind, they are interestingly unpredictable. One day, I'm all into romance novels, and the next day, I'm craving adventure stories. Last year, I was swooning over Greek myths. My friends and I devoured every book we could find on this genre. Who knew that one day my love for Greek myth would come to a pause? Where did all the love and talks about Oedipus, Polyphemus, the one-eyed giant, Orestes, and the like go? This year, I haven't picked up a single Greek myth book. Just like the earth, my love for books is not static as it is always on the move, never staying in one place for too long.

One interesting thing about me is my passion for looking at things beyond the surface level, mostly books. I am a literature student (a good one at that), and it is not surprising that I have developed a solid interest in analyzing and critiquing books beyond the surface level. I have realized that books (literature) don’t have the power to DO things in society. Simply put, books don’t have the power to bring about change or impact in society. No, they don’t work that way. It is important to note that “books” do not work in a cause-effect manner.

DOES LITERATURE (PROSE, POETRY, AND DRAMA) DO ANYTHING IN SOCIETY?

Have you ever stopped to consider whether books truly DO anything in society? Some might argue that books have taught them about their culture, religion, and history, but is that really DOING anything? Yes, I agree that prose, poetry, and drama help us understand our history and culture, but does that bring about tangible actions? For example, if you argue that one of the books DO is that they help us learn about our culture and history, how has this knowledge helped to solve the problems of poverty, hunger, and corruption? Again, books are not designed to work this way.

Books do not have the power to bring about practical effects in society. Not That Woman by Tosin-Jobi Tume is a play by a Nigerian writer. It explores the themes of female oppression and gender inequality. Do you think staging this book will immediately solve the issue of female oppression and gender inequality in Nigeria? Or if a play like Harvest of Corruption by Frank Ogodo Ogbeche examines the issue of corruption, you seem to think that merely staging the play means that corruption will automatically vanish? The fact that a book explores contemporary societal issues, does not mean it will automatically eradicate them. Books do not work that way.

However, this does not mean books do not DO anything. They DO things in a quiet, rather than cause-and-effect way. When it comes to culture, it is true that books help preserve the authenticity of cultures. But, it should be noted that it does this in a simple and quiet way. Books explore and present to the audience the complexities of society. Books show us the good and bad parts of society, helping us understand different aspects of human feelings, pain, and struggles. They make us think about important issues and help us understand different perspectives and opinions. Through stories and characters, books reflect the world we live in.

Summarily, books are not designed to bring about immediate changes. They do not work that way. Books are reflections of society, not solutions to its problems.

Note: All images in this post are mine.

Thanks for reading.

Sort:  

I think this is the part where I have to say WORD! You hear people say things like, "it's not like anything will change no matter how many book on gender inequality you read." And while it is partly true, you have to understand that books work on an individual and not mainly the society. It attunes our psyche to remember parts of the book when we come across real life situations.

You didn't brag too much in this one, Justfavour. But it was still such a delightful read. I can't continue talking or my comment would be as long as the post itself.😄

Hey, Cat. Great to see you here! It's wonderful to have someone who shares a passion for books visit this post. I completely agree with you - books may resonate differently with each of us, but they indeed offer valuable insights and help us navigate real-life challenges.

Come on, Cat. Don’t start this. I didn't brag at all.

Thanks for stopping by. 🌹🌹

One of my bad takes that I admit is probably literature as in literary criticism should only be taught to people at age 25 or above where they have more experiences on life and therefore books can be apparatus to either reflect, learn or second opinion. But anything below that, books should just be something to read without enforcing anyone to read between the lines which often teachers do at schools.

Interesting read, I could have said more but that's that :D

Hello there, @macchiata . I totally understand you take on this subject. To an extent, you take is “fair enough.” Your perspective is interesting. When it comes to literary criticism, people above 25 (adults) and more knowledgeable. It is true that life experience can enrich our understanding of literature. However, don't you think that introducing literary analysis earlier can also help students develop critical thinking skills and a deeper appreciation for literature?