[EN-ES] A new type of token is necessary to enforce Open Science type initiatives

in #hive-1963872 years ago


OpenScience
Screenshot from Source


English

#Hive's bases are inclusive, and the fact of working on the blockchain makes the content immutable and above all public. All these factors make it attractive for Open Science Initiatives[1].

The functioning of tokenized communities provides additional support to Hive's general machinery to reward good content, the one that applies the scientific method and at the same time recognizes the merit of what was created as long as we all have public access to the contents and the review goes beyond peer review, we can all be referees and the impact of the vote is proportional to the merit earned. A similar use has the STEM token, which in our opinion does not enhance the recognition of the scientific rigor of the publications and the accumulated merit since it can be traded or transferred.

News recently has been talking about other functionalities that should come to Hive-Engine, I have been attentive to some posts here on Hive and on Twitter. Many new things in Hive are coming that will undoubtedly increase its use value. I think that encouraging tokens that are not transferable, except for the issuer of the tokens to users within the tokeonomy, would promote many use cases such as the one we are dealing with here for the evaluation of scientific prestige. A similar token already exists, Hive prestige points, but these are general in scope within Hive, something more specific is needed.

I also believe that the wheel should not be reinvented, and that's why I write in this SteemSocial community because I think that within the Steem universe is one of the Mayo impacts linked to science, this could be the managing and governing community of this Open Science Initiative.

A sincere debate within the community could be the impetus for a concerted proposal that extends the functionalities of Front-Ends such as SteemGreek, or perhaps the creation of a new one that filters the contents displayed more rigorously (I am signing up for this task). When it comes to science, a little healthy censorship is necessary, that provided by interlocutors of ethical action and earned prestige. Not for nothing at this point in time, there are still human beings convinced that the earth is flat.


FlatEarth
Source

And remember:
Freedom exists only when it belongs to everyone

Thank you for reading us, we hope we have added something to your knowledge or reaffirmed the one you have.

Cheers!


Español

Las bases de #Hive son inclusivas, y el hecho de trabajar en la blockchain hace que el contenido sea inmutable y sobre todo público. Todos estos factores lo hacen atractivo para las Iniciativas de Ciencia Abierta[1].

El funcionamiento de las comunidades tokenizadas proporciona un apoyo adicional a la maquinaria general de Hive para premiar el buen contenido, la que aplica el método científico y al mismo tiempo reconoce el mérito de lo creado siempre que todos tengamos acceso público a los contenidos y la revisión vaya más allá de la revisión por pares, todos podamos ser árbitros y el impacto de la votación sea proporcional al mérito obtenido. Un uso similar tiene el token STEM, que en nuestra opinión no potencia el reconocimiento del rigor científico de las publicaciones y el mérito acumulado ya que puede ser comercializado o transferido.

Noticias recientemente se ha estado hablando de otras funcionalidades que deberían llegar a Hive-Engine, he estado atento a algunas publicaciones aquí en Hive y en Twitter. Se avecinan muchas cosas nuevas en Hive que sin duda aumentarán su valor de uso. Creo que fomentar tokens que no sean transferibles, excepto por el emisor de los tokens a los usuarios dentro de la tokeonomía, esto promovería muchos casos de uso como el que estamos tratando aquí para la evaluación del prestigio científico. Un token similar ya existe, los puntos de prestigio de Hive, pero estos son de alcance general dentro de Hive, algo más específico es necesario.

También creo que la rueda no se debe volver a inventar, y por eso escribo en esta comunidad SteemSocial, porque creo que dentro del universo de Steem es uno de los de mayo impact vinculado a la ciencia, podría esta ser la comunidad gestora y rectora de esta Iniciativa de Ciencia Abierta.

Un debate sincero dentro de la comunidad podría ser el impulso para una propuesta concertada que amplíe las funcionalidades de Front-Ends como SteemGreek, o tal vez la creación de uno nuevo que filtre los contenidos mostrados de manera más rigurosa (Me apunto para esta tarea). Cuando se trata de ciencia, es necesaria una pequeña censura saludable, la proporcionada por interlocutores de acción ética y prestigio ganado. No en vano en este momento todavía hay seres humanos convencidos de que la tierra es plana.

Y recuerde:
** La libertad existe solo cuando pertenece a todos**
Gracias por leernos, esperamos haber agregado algo a su conocimiento o reafirmado el que tiene.
¡Salud!


  1. NASA Open-Source Science Initiative

Sort:  


The rewards earned on this comment will go directly to the people( @ertytux ) sharing the post on Twitter as long as they are registered with @poshtoken. Sign up at https://hiveposh.com.

Thanks for your contribution to the STEMsocial community. Feel free to join us on discord to get to know the rest of us!

Please consider delegating to the @stemsocial account (85% of the curation rewards are returned).

Thanks for including @stemsocial as a beneficiary, which gives you stronger support. 
 

Yay! 🤗
Your content has been boosted with Ecency Points, by @tuxtify.
Use Ecency daily to boost your growth on platform!

Support Ecency
Vote for new Proposal
Delegate HP and earn more

Estas madrugador hermano @tuxtify. Justo de un tema parecido hablé en uno de mis primeros posts, le veo tremendo potencial a implementar estrategias de Ciencia Abierta dentro de Hive, creo que tu fuiste más allá y analizaste Steem y @steemsocial. Si se llega a concertar algo de una plataforma Front-End no me dejen fuera, tu sabes Django Forever. Abrazo!!

Congratulations @tuxtify! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s):

You received more than 1500 upvotes.
Your next target is to reach 1750 upvotes.
You got more than 50 replies.
Your next target is to reach 100 replies.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Support the HiveBuzz project. Vote for our proposal!

At some point, we considered creating a STEMsocial token for the reasons you mentioned (by the way, note that STEMgeeks and STEMsocial are two different things, and that we have nothing to do with the STEM token; for anything related to the latter, you should reach out @themarkymark).

However, we, at STEMsocial, decided no to create our token. The main question is: what would be the value of such a token? Or equivalently, what should we do to give such a token value? I have no answer to that question and I know marky is fighting hard to prevent STEM value to melt.

At some point, I was more in favour of creating badges , as well as having our dedicated frontend through which we could filter what is visible by default, across tags, without having to censor anything (so that we could show up a nice view to the external world). I still really want to deal with this, but unfortunately, finding a developer, dedicating time, etc., are all not trivial. I tried to do it by myself, but I am definitely too busy to handle that.

Anyway, thanks for bringing up the discussion. Too bad no one seems to react (I am currently super over busy due to an approaching grant proposal deadline).

Cheers!

Even though I have been inside Hive for a short time now, and I have been studying it before entering, I was confused and thought that the STEM family was united, your words explain many things to me.
A token representing prestige should not be transferable or exchanged, only earned. In this sense, badges may be the way to go. It would be necessary to create measurable parameters of the scientific impact of the publications and the accumulated merit of the authors and that this is related to the % of votes in new cures or of a trail.
I'm going to study the issue of badges inside Hive more in-depth.
In the same way, we could calmly create the specific Front-End, it will be my entertainment when time allows me.
Thanks a lot for commenting.
Cheers!