Sort:  

You can add Putin to that list and so many others lol It's a joke and doesn't matter. War is brutal always will be.

You're not wrong that the list could be longer (and also recall Putin is on that list, from some time ago), but I disagree the brutal realities of military conflict excuse deliberate cruelty to non-combatants. I also disagree that it's a joke and doesn't matter, because the parties will be subject to arrest in many polities which will reduce their spheres of action potential to them going forward. Were more polities dedicated to the rule of law they wouldn't be safe abroad at all.

Thanks!

@valued-customer, I paid out 0.529 HIVE and 0.149 HBD to reward 6 comments in this discussion thread.

i hope that the middle east and all other areas of conflicts will soon live in peace and get the basic rights of enough food & water, shelter, healthcare, education. have a good day

🙏

I hope so too.

Thanks!

Congratulations @valued-customer! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)

You distributed more than 63000 upvotes.
Your next target is to reach 64000 upvotes.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

hmmm, considering the historical connection between the united nations and israel to begin with it is questionable as to how this is to be enforced. it always seemed to exist for those other members ;)

i feel we are witnessing systemic revamping of the geopolitical landscape.

look what wiki says:

"Finally, the General Assembly convened a conference in Rome in June 1998, with the aim of finalizing the treaty to serve as the Court's statute. On 17 July 1998, the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court was adopted by a vote of 120 to seven, with 21 countries abstaining. The seven countries that voted against the treaty were China, Iraq, Israel, Libya, Qatar, the U.S., and Yemen.[23]

Israel's opposition to the treaty stemmed from the inclusion in the list of war crimes "the action of transferring population into occupied territory"."

lol

Several countries have said they will act on the warrant should Netanyahu show up inside their borders. Italy, Canada, and the UK have at least said they would. It's unlikely they'll have that opportunity, having forwarned the criminals. However, there are strong forces moving to arrest Netanyahu inside Israel too, so, whether Israel agrees the rest of the world has the right to arrest them, the rest of the world will decide themselves what happens on their dirt, and Israelis will decide what happens on theirs, and Netanyahu may finally end up held responsible for what he's done, or at least some of it.

Thanks!

Yes, about time.

Thanks!