You are absolutely right to note that only fools rush to judgment and unreservedly support rhetoric without first ascertaining if there is any substance to it. Discernment is the charge the wise are fairly assigned, and the record of our enemies is strewn with examples of insuperable assertions notoriously insubstantiable, and these are as easily swatted away as flies. But Calin Georgescu presents a different mien, a career of exemplary service arrested suddenly by his discovery of the blackmail suffered by institutions and people in power. I have but scant familiarity with him, and his career, or his country, people, and the legal foundations of the republic for which he stands, but it is impossible to assign credibility to the assertions of the institutional power of media and government arrayed against his candidacy, and the statement of the favored opponent in that election starkly reveals it's void of substance.
This from the career media presenter favored by the powers that presently rule Romania who was projected to lose the election that was called off. Additionally, the sitting President issued a statement he said was 'for NATO', assuring them that Romania was a reliable ally, that Romania wasn't 'in trouble'.
From the distant view I have of the drama I see no inconsistency or disingenuity that can be laid at Georgescu's feet, and the acts of government are exactly consistent with his challenge of their fraudulent claim to power. As I said, it looks like the Romanian government took examples from the US government that sought to weaponize it's duties into assaults on the electoral power of the American people, censoring their discussions, hiding evidence of fraud, and even crimes against humanity, in order to keep power, and continue to commit those crimes.
The fullness of time alone will reveal the truth, but today I have discerned no duplicity from Georgescu, and that of the Romanian government is glaringly obvious.
Thanks!