For the last month or so, we've been inundated with breathless reporting and lurid video of what are clearly drones flying over New Jersey. Before that there were numerous reports of such swarms of drones invading airspace over military bases, both in England and in the USA. None of this reporting contains even a hint of what action, if any, has been taken to identify the threat - because it is a threat - or to prevent it from happening.
IMG source - Odysee.com - ThunderWizard
Clearly, the US military is playing with drones, and this despite the recent complete direct denial by a Pentagon spokesperson that is the case. All of this reporting cannot be true. There cannot have been no action taken to identify threat actors invading US military air space. I would conduct some investigation were drones to invade my personal airspace. I am certainly not remotely as competent as the US military at defending my airspace. Anyone that thinks I could be should share whatever awesome drugs they are letting think for them, so I can become as mindless and ridiculously disconnected from reality. I could use a little vacation.
So, we might expect them to lie about what specific actions they took, because those are things that might provide some benefit of foreknowledge to the enemies of the USA. But, the US military continues to pretend to complete ignorance of the identity of the threat actor infiltrating potential weapons platforms into US military restricted airspace, after more than a month of these events being reported, and now we are specifically told it is not the US military flying these drones. Again, we should expect the US military to lie about these things, because it's remotely conceivable that foreign adversaries could be carefully examining the reporting and the drones being shown and draw conclusions regarding US military capabilities.
However, common sense dispels most of the possibilities on the table here. First, what is known about drones of this size includes certain limitations in range and airtime potential. They have fuel for so long if powered by ICE engines, and batteries have only so much range. Drones over New Jersey cannot be coming from Iran, for example, despite some bizarre claim to the contrary that an Iranian 'mothership' off the coast is launching these drones. Were this actually the case, the ghosts of the Mohicans would have taken to birch bark canoes and captured the mothership with bows and arrows. We shot down a weather balloon, FFS. So, the idea that these drones are from any foreign adversary is disproved.
So, these drones are being operated by the US military, and it's obviously the case that is so. These drones are not being deployed in Iraq or Jordan, where testing military capabilities of new platforms would be expected. They're being flown in the UK, and over the USA itself. This strongly suggests these drones are for domestic use. That's why the Pentagon has denied they are their drones. Not all enemies of the United States of America are foreign. The clear language of the Constitution refers to domestic enemies, and that is what these drones are being used to defend against.
Specifically in New Jersey. This post is a warning for American nationals living in New Jersey. The US military is acting to defend the USA against YOU. Give that thought.
Anyway, the reporting on this issue reflects the degraded intellectual capacity of the audience, and also the propagandists. After all, when your victims are defenseless, you don't have to develop much in the way of weapons to defeat them. There isn't any superable explanation for these drones except that they are US government weapons platforms, and they are intended to act on domestic populations, because that's what they're doing. Swarms of government drones are being deployed in New Jersey, for some reason.
Is there a specific threat in New Jersey they are acting to counter? I am unaware of any specific situations that need handling there. If you have any information about threats to the republic from New Jersey let me know in the comments, please. What I think is more likely is that these drones aren't limited to acting in New Jersey. The Phoenix Lights incident comes to mind. This would necessarily be the case were the US government acting to deploy drones to counter threats to the USG, because I cannot think of anything the USG could consider a threat to itself that could be confined to New Jersey. Whatever they're acting to counter there needs must be countered across the 50 states severally, but the reporting doesn't have to do so.
Ya'll seeing drone activity at your location? How close are we to a skynet military police state using the surveillance information Elon Musk's satellite network is providing the US military? It looks like we are already there, TBH, at least in New Jersey. They just don't seem to be actually interacting with civilians yet, other than closer surveillance than is possible from satellites. When they do, we'll know what domestic military purpose the USG has for these drones.
Edit: There is this new report from @redacted on Odysee that is a closer look at 'fifty drones that emerged from the ocean and shot up into the sky' according to a state legislator. These do not appear to be drones at all. Project Bluebean holographic projections? Anyway, just thought I'd add this information. The video of the wheel within a wheel brings some Ezekiel to mind, as Clayton mentions. However, the censored post claiming the NJ drones are military drones neglects that there are multiple sources of drones, and holographic projections as well.[end of edit]
Re-Edit: it turns out that HB 8610 is before Congress at this time, and re-authorizes an excessively authoritarian power to restrict civilian drones (commonly described as Orwellian). This makes it most likely that the US government is being as offensive as possible with it's stable of drones while not claiming responsibility, in order to so outrage people that the abusive re-authorization law is passed. [end re-edit]
Can you think of any acceptable military purpose(s) for weaponized drone swarms over US clay? I can think of lots of unacceptable ones, but I'm not going to mention them. There's no point in giving anyone any ideas they haven't already had, after all, and if the civilian population of America is now seen as a threat to the government of America, well there's no point in giving my enemies any information about my capabilities. Pretty sure my pseudonymity here doesn't pertain to state actors, who can likely image me typing away in my shorts at 3 am using their Starshield assets, and access my content before it leaves my personal device. Certainly it is widely known that covert actors are able to remove items from our personal devices, as I have seen it happening to others reported widely, so it's not just happening on my device - or in my head, as some would certainly suggest.
The AI is in your system, making your typos, forgetting your archives for you, as we speak. I submit that since it is obvious that polities aren't capable of defending their jurisdictions from the terrorist superweapon the US military has perfected, as we seen proven in Syria, the obvious resort of people that would be free of political oppression imposed by the US military is decentralization, which I continuously advocate. This is being countered by the ubiquitous surveillance using Starshield's satellite network provided the US military by Elon Musk's Spacex, and the close surveillance and potential to act locally that drones provide the US military, extended by the AI that has infiltrated our personal devices. These are the nominal means to counter the ability of free people to live without suffering the oppression of US jurisdiction.
Can air gapped systems remain free of skynet intrusion? So far, I don't see any sign they can't. Some food for thought.
