After years of exposing fraud, scams, and deception by publicly traded companies, a short selling firm Hindenburg Research is closing its doors. This news was surprising and unexpected for many including myself. In my opinion, Hindenburg Research has been one of the most important and needed market participants. I especially liked the business model. What Hindenburg Research has been doing is conducting extensive investigations and research, identifying wrongdoings and not so honest practices by publicly traded companies, and afterwards taking a short position and sharing the research with the public. Investigating companies and doing thorough research requires skills, time, and money. However, professional research and well executed short trades would cover all the costs and bring profits. While making money, the firm would also serve the other participants of the market by identifying and revealing important information about these companies and their stock valuations.
Nate Anderson, the founder of Hindenburg Research has decided it was time to disband the firm and move on to more interesting things in life. Of course everybody is asking why? However, it seems there no real answer to this. Or in other words the answer is Just because. Usually, we would expect some direct reasons like firm is going bankrupt, internal conflicts, external threats, conflicts of interest, acquisitions, etc. None of these seem to apply here. In a way, this may the most ethical way of reaching an end for a firm like Hindenburg Research. There is no need for a reason. There was a mission. A mission became missions. All mission accomplished, time to move on. Maybe this was the thought process. Or maybe we will hear more in the future. For now, it seems the firm has shown a better way of participating in the markets, and has educated many that there are dishonest players in the markets. While they have done a great job with their research and investigations, and earned themselves a good reputation, what Hindenburg Research have done can be done by others as well. Maybe this is the way of Hindenburg Research passing the torch to the crowd in making markets transparent and efficient.
It seems like they will reveal their processes and procedures in the near future for others to utilize if they choose too. We may hear more to the Hindburg Research story when this happens. For now, we can thank them for their service and wish them well in their future endeavors. I will definitely miss their reports on market scams and deceptions. Over the last couple of years I have become a regular reader of their publications, and have been following their cases. I have written multiple blog posts regarding their research and trades when I found them to be interesting. What really still surprises me is that how much fraud and deception is allowed for publicly traded companies. I have also understood how SEC was more of a political agency rather than a neutral regulator that protects people from scammer and fraudsters. Hindenburg Research has show how there is a lot to be corrected in markets by agencies like SEC. However, instead of dealing with real criminal behavior, SEC have chosen to go after crypto in the recent years and haven't improved anything.
By doing excellent job investigating, researching and trading based on their findings, Hindenburg Research earned themselves a great reputation. So much so, that their publications alone would influence the markets and make their short positions profitable even without a need to convince the investors. Participants would simply trust, or use the news as a shorting opportunity. Not only they have gone after smaller companies, but they have targetted more powerful players like Adani Group, and even made Carl Icahn their enemy. While there have been many legal threats for defamation by powerful players in the markets against Hindeburg Research, in my opinion, none of them had any merits, nor they have accomplished anything. I am sure Hindenburg Research have done a great job protecting themselves from malicious legal actions.
It seems like the decision to shut down the firm wasn't a sudden one, and rather planned decent time ago with a goal of finishing research and ideas already in process. According to Nate Anderson, last of their Ponzi case was completed and findings were shared with regulators. The end of their last project came in today, and this will mark the end of the firm itself as well. I would like to see Hindenburg Research continues, because of the quality of their work. But I also believe they deserve to end things in their own terms and there is much more to live than research and markets. I am sure there are other firms that will emerge with similar quality research and dedication of making things better while making money, rather than utilizing tools to take away money from retail traders. I am curious to see more about their processes and procedures of how they have done their research and planned short positions. What I really interested to know is how profitable this business model has been. I hope they have been winning with their trades as well, just like they won with their audience and other market participants.
Not everybody can just walk away from a successful business. Those who can are impressive. It not easy to just say "I quit" doing things that you have enjoyed over the years and probably gained many skills along this journey. I am not sure how these skills would translate into their lives beyond Hindeburg Research, I am sure they have better things to do, and life is not only about money and profits. I wouldn't be surprised to see similar projects that benefit people form this team in the future. I hope will have even more Hindenburg Research like firms to emerge and continue making the markets more transparent and efficient.