Where a mask, we're told, because it saves lives. Is that really true? Few question the veracity of this claim. But those who do, may find the truth in the scientific literature. It's not extremely difficult to find, as many have gone through the work and have pointed us to the papers and studies.
Another area one can look at is what PPE, personal protective equipment, experts have to say about using masks for the stated purpose that governments and other authorized unsanctioned health experts say they are effective at doing. One person who is an extensive PPE expert has been interviewed in the video put online to demonstrate the science behind mask wearing and their ability to stop a virus from spreading or infecting you.
Stephen Petty is his name, and he has a long history of credentials to prove he's an expert and knows what he's talking about. You can view the long list in this video at the one minute mark.
There are four main points he gets into our that PPE is the least desirable way to protect someone from a virus. That masks themselves are not actually PPE. The latest scientific evidence suggests that covert particles are being spread through aerosolized particles, not droplets, which means only respirators can protect your lungs, and outside of respirators masks don't work, neither does the 6 foot rule. Even though there may be some sprinter droplets, they are not the greater cause of concern because the aerosolized smaller particles are the ones that reach deeper into the lungs.
Following that, Petty explains the most effective controls in a hierarchy of control chart. The most effective is substitution or elimination, which isn't applicable to coven as it is a virus and you can't substitute for something else or eliminate from the environment.
After that you have engineering controls, which would be dilution, destruction and containment. This refers to our ability to contain a virus. Which also isn't very applicable because you can't do that when it's already in your environment. Instead, the unwise government policies backed by erroneous opinions from sanctioned medical experts, is to contain people instead. But does this work?
Answer is no. This relates to the next point about administrative controls where you limit times and exposure area. Containing people inside their homes is the worst place, because that is where the greatest exposure areas in confined areas. The safest place to be is an open areas, such as outside. But this is the opposite of the idiotic government mandates to lock people down and force them to be isolated inside their homes, trying to prevent them from going outside which is the best place to be, if you're actually afraid of this virus.
The fourth position in the chart, nearly the least effective, are PPE. The only PPE we can work is a properly fitting respirator, but even this isn't that effective. Letting people go outside, rather than forcing them to be confined inside and lockdowns in fear hysteria, is more effective.
Lastly, what is not even included in the hierarchy of controls to minimize exposure, or masks. These do not even work. They are not even considered an option as a method to minimize exposure. Masks are useless. This has been demonstrated in previous studies that all of a sudden didn't matter in the scamdemic narrative.
I will leave you with some screenshots from the presentation, but you should go watch yourself if you want to become informed and actually no what works and what doesn't work, if you're actually afraid of a virus that pretty much only affects the very old and those who are health compromise, just as any other respiratory illness will affect.
