Imad Wasim retires from international cricket

source image

Pakistan allrounder Imad Wasim has retired from international cricket with immediate effect. Imad, who announced his retirement with a post on social media, played 55 ODIs and 66 T20Is for Pakistan as a left-arm spinner and lower-order batter. He last represented Pakistan in April this year in a T20I against New Zealand in Rawalpindi.

"In recent days I have been doing a lot of thinking about my international career and I have come to the conclusion that now is the right time for me to announce my retirement from international cricket," Imad wrote on X. "I would like to thank the PCB for all their support over the years - it has truly been an honour to represent Pakistan.

"Each of my 121 appearances across the ODI and T20I formats was a dream come true. It's an exciting time for Pakistan cricket going forwards with new coaches and leadership incoming. I wish all involved every success and I look forward to watching the team excel.

"Thank you to the Pakistan fans for always supporting me with such passion. A final thank you to my family and friends who have been so important in helping me achieve at the highest level. I now look forward to focussing on the next stage of my playing career away from the international stage."

Imad, now 34, was part of Pakistan's Under-19 World Cup-winning side in 2006 and went on to lead Pakistan in the next edition, in 2008. He had to wait till 2015 for a Pakistan debut, in a T20I against Zimbabwe in Lahore. This was when international cricket returned to Pakistan six years after the attack on the Sri Lankan team in Lahore. He represented Pakistan in the T20 World Cup that followed, in 2016. In 2019, he captained Pakistan, in two ODIs against Australia in Dubai, when regular captain Shoaib Malik was out with an injury.

In all, he took 44 wickets and scored 986 runs in ODIs. In T20Is, he took 65 wickets and scored 486 runs. His best performance with the ball, incidentally, is identical in both formats - 5 for 14.

Imad is currently in Karachi Kings' roster for the PSL, and recently played in the Hundred, the CPL and the LPL as well. He has also been a regular in the English county circuit. In fact, born in Swansea in Wales, he played his early cricket in the UK.

reference

Sort:  

!DHEDGE

Congratulations @sehrish-nosheen! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)

You received more than 900 upvotes.
Your next target is to reach 1000 upvotes.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

1


This post has been selected for upvote from our token accounts by @fc-curation! Based on your tags you received upvotes from the following account(s):

- @dhedge.bonus
- @dhedge.pob
- @dhedge.alive

@fc-curation has 13 vote calls left today.

Hold 10 or more DHEDGE to unlock daily dividends. Hold 100 or more DHEDGE to unlock thread votes. Calling in our curation accounts currently has a minimum holding requirement of 100 DHEDGE. The more DHEDGE you hold, the higher upvote you can call in. Buy DHEDGE on Tribaldex or earn some daily by joining one of our many delegation pools at app.dhedge.cc.

Copying/Pasting content (full or partial texts, video links, art, etc.) with adding very little original content is frowned upon by the community. Publishing such content could be considered exploitation of the "Hive Reward Pool" and may result in the account being Blacklisted.

Please refrain from copying and pasting, or decline the rewards on those posts going forward.

If you believe this comment is in error, please contact us in #appeals in Discord.

Hi! Our community has clarified the guidelines for posts. To quote this, "Remember: no illegal content, plagiarism, or blatant spam!"

When posts have linked sources, we do not consider them plagiarism or spam, and thus permit them within our community. When you claim that it is "frowned upon by the community," you are not speaking on behalf of our specific community, of which you are not (yet) a member, as you did not join the community - although are always welcome to do so.

Now, in the understanding that copying and pasting content from other sources, even when the sources are identified, does not take as much time/effort as original content, we have already adjusted our rewards to reflect this: we reward the minimum 1 HSBI and a small curation vote (10-15%) compared to original content, which typically receives higher rewards. It does not require any additional adjustments by outside actors.

We maintain this position because we believe that sharing content from other sources is an important aspect of social media, and therefore does provide some value. There are users on Hive who would otherwise not see the shared media if it were not posted and properly sourced here.

If you wish to provide your opinion and participate in our curation, feel free to reach out to us and we'll certainly openly consider your thoughts and position(s) for curation, as we continually expand in scope. After all, we always remain open to opinions and find value in different points of view. However, please do not preemptively attempt to speak on behalf of the community and to control how it chooses to reward its users.

Thank you for your understanding, and have yourself a great new week!

Hello.

Your community was created a year ago.
Copypasta spam with no original content added has been frowned upon since 2016.
Just because you consider this effortless spam acceptable it does not override the general consensus of the Hive community. The general consensus is reflected in the support that we receive in our proposal.
Thank you

It is not "copypasta spam" unless it is reposted multiple times. A single post with an added source is considered a sourced post, and shared content from other social media.

You do not wish to acknowledge its value in social media, and that is your opinion. However, that is an opinion and not objective fact (as opposed to direct plagiarism, direct spamming, etc.). Are opinions of content value part of the purview for hivewatchers?

Once again, if you wish to be part of the curation team for the community, you are welcome to discuss this with us, and we can always put it to a vote within our community. Otherwise, you are intruding into our community and making value decisions based upon your established opinion and overriding the rest of the community, seeing as your vote canceled out all of the others which were positive.

I ask you kindly to either respect our own community guidelines, speak with us so that we may come to a conclusion before you start overriding our votes, or to kindly leave us alone to continue functioning as a cohesive community.

The account is part of the scam group belonging to certain abuser. The spam-abuse group which you support and defend.

sadiabibi
saleembk
sehrish-nosheen

The defence of evident defence of abuse of the Hive reward pool and the incentivising of spam raises an eyebrow.
This community's activity will be now watched for possible incentivising and rewarding of abuse on Hive.

The account is part of the scam group belonging to certain abuser. The spam-abuse group which you support and defend.

I will request proof of this. Thus far, the 2nd and 3rd accounts have posted 1 article per day from an outside source,, none repeated, and all sourced. It is not my favorite content, but it is not spam nor is it plagiarism. This has been my experience with them while they have posted in this community.


I've offered a reasonable option to have you apply as a member of our curation team so that we could hear out your opinions in more detail, and also to put it up for a community vote. I've explained my personal rationale for the value that sharing content can provide, but you choose to ignore the reasoning behind this argument.

You insist upon your opinion and ignore the question of whether it is within the purview of hivewatchers, which is supposed to be objective. Are you afraid to answer this question and reveal bias?

Instead, your response is to levy threats upon this community. You are the abuser. You should be ashamed of yourself for how you handled this situation.

I will be making a post about this and allow the community to decide. However, based on your current behavior and refusal to accept the openness that I offered you, your presence is not currently welcomed here. Do not bother the members of my community.

Vote trading scheme? HSBI is not a vote trading scheme. It is a reward system that has been around for over 6 years.

We are rewarding quality content, quality engagement, and quality participation. Our rewards are public. There are no votes being traded here. This was a disingenuous comment on your behalf.

If you'd like more information about HSBI works, I created a write-up several months ago which may be of use. In case you refuse to read it, @josephsavage, I hope you will be kind enough to explain how HSBI works to @hivewatcher.

I recommend switching to Steemit.
This abuse is incentivised, rewarded and welcomed there.
Your Free Compliments community will likely get support there.

Nice little edit there. How is rewarding HSBI and Ecency Points considered abuse? Please do explain your rationale.

Hive SBI is an account-based curation program with a deep history on Hive. Members curate others for ongoing support, and they receive their curation rewards back in the form of upvotes on their own content.

While we believe that the choice of which accounts represent quality should be up to the individual, we agree that plagiarism, fraud, and minimal effort content should not receive a slice of the reward pool.

If an account merely cross-posts content that they did not themselves create we are in agreement with @hivewatchers that the content is plagiarism and should not be rewarded. We are adding sehrish-nosheen to our skiplist, so they will not receive any support from Hive SBI, regardless of how many units they are sponsored with.

We have less formal channels with @freecompliments, so have messaged them there, but will formally state for the record that we are discouraging them from sponsoring HSBI units for this type of content.

There is merit in the argument that 'curating content from elsewhere' is normal behavior for social media, but most social media does not include direct monetization for the end user. Hive as a community needs to hold itself to a higher standard.

Monetization of content that was creating by others, without obtaining explicit permission from the creator or adding substantial effort of ones own, such as extensive quotation or fair use doctrine, is plagiarism, illegal in most jurisdictions, and not supported by Hive SBI.

Loading...