Transfer Anxiety

in #hive-1679223 years ago


ladderanxiety.jpg

Transfer Anxiety is the very worst part of the crypto user experience.

Does anyone remember a few years back when we'd transfer Bitcoin to Coinbase or another centralized exchange and we might not get confirmation of that deposit for over an hour? Depending on how much money was being sent, this was a very nail biting experience.

We all know that if we sent crypto to the wrong wallet, the money is simply lost. Wondering if we just lost that $10k for over an hour is an extremely stressful experience, even for someone like me who's done it dozens of times. New users have an even worse experience during this downtime.

Sometime in the last couple years, centralized exchanges realized the folly of their system and started sending the confirmation email instantly, before the operation got confirmed in a block. The user experience is much much better now. The second Bitcoin nodes know about the transfer, the centralized exchange sends confirmation before the money is officially confirmed in a block.

Now the longest wait time occurs when the receiver is also an exchange, and we have to wait for exchange1 to release the money to exchange2. This is a vast improvement, because during this time we can see that the transfer is still processing on exchange1 and are not worried that a user error occurred. For self-hosted wallets, the confirmation comes instantly.

What about Hive?

The 3 second blocks on this network absolutely eliminate the bad user experience of waiting around for the transfer to be confirmed. Transfer anxiety is further limited by the fact that money is sent to and from readable alphanumeric accounts rather than random strings of hex code or other hashes. It's such a small thing, but it makes a huge difference.

Now that the upcoming hardfork is going to reduce irreversibility to mere seconds (compared to a minute) Hive will further reduce transfer anxiety and give the people what they want: instant gratification.

Instant Gratification.

Again, it seems like not a big deal, but it is a huge deal. People want what they want, and they want it now. The crypto solutions that lean into this kind of convenience are going to do quite well when mainstream adoption rolls in. The difference between 4 seconds and 40 seconds is impressive. The difference between 4 seconds and 10 minutes (if you're lucky) is just silly.

Again, we can see here that Bitcoin's security niche is actually a very small subset of what the cryptosphere needs, and that's a good thing. Every chain that does one thing very well is going to succeed. Chains that try to do everything are going to run into massive scaling problems down the line. In a space like this it's better for our network to be an expert in one area rather than a jack of all trades.

Once interoperability comes into play the expert chains will begin to link up, and a greater kind of meta-network will be created. Who's going to want to use something like Ethereum when they can use the meta-network that does everything better, faster, and cheaper? I like Ethereum and the EVM clones, but I also think they're going to be constantly fighting an uphill battle. Work smart, not hard.

securesecuritylockkey.jpg

Timelocks

Another big part of eliminating crypto anxiety are a combination of the timelocking and recovery service. If someone gets ahold of our Bitcoin private key, we lose all our money, guaranteed. With something like Hive we only lose whatever is liquid. We can change our active key with our owner key if it becomes compromised, and even if the owner key is compromised we can recover the account without losing any decentralization.

Account recovery is a very underestimated ability of the networks @dan has created. Probably because it doesn't get used that often. But the devil is in the details. The ability to change the database without losing security is a mastered skill in crypto. The things that happen the least often (most notably block reorganizations) are the most important pieces of this tech. It's all about how we handle the edge cases, not so much about day to day operations (just ask LUNA).

Conclusion

There are many forms of anxiety in the cryptosphere, but transfer anxiety is by-in-large the worst one that spans across the entire sector. The networks that mitigate this bad experience by performing faster confirmations are going to go a long way when Average Joe makes his way onto the blockchain.

Nobody likes waiting around for things to happen. People want their decisions to be executed as quickly as possible after they're made. Hive goes a long way to satiate this innate desire for instant gratification and convenience. Account recovery and timelocks are icing on the cake when it comes to the security of the chain and putting people's minds at ease.

Ten years down the line, people are going to realize what Bitcoin is actually for. It's for the banks, governments, and corporations that want to send millions of dollars at a time in the cheapest, fastest, and most secure way possible.

When one is sending $50M to another entity, 10 minutes an a $50 fee is pretty damn quick and cheap. Blazing fast, even. Wait an hour more and the operation becomes virtually irreversible. After a day it becomes set in stone. That's real security on the most trusted settlement layer.

Disruption comes in the form of adoption, not elimination.

Average Joe is having none of that. He wants near instant transactions, not a thirty minute average wait on three block confirmations. Why would Average Joe use the same solution as a multi-million dollar corporation? That doesn't even make sense.

The real winners in all of this are the niche chains that do a couple tasks very well. Ethereum tried to do everything, and look where that got them! Now there are dozens of EVM chains running around acting as the "second layer" to ETH. Surely there are some advantages to this (modular codebase and huge sweeping communities with atomic-swaps), but during real mainstream adoption the solutions that try to do everything will find that they can't do anything as good as the niche chains. They will be filled to the brim and be unable to service all the users that want to participate in the new thing.

When looking at Hive and Bitcoin, there is no competition. Hive and Bitcoin are both networks that do niche tasks that none of the other networks are even attempting to 'compete' with. That's great, as there are still hundreds of niche tasks available for the other chains to becomes experts at. The entire space synergizes together. This is not a competition, but rather a cooperative open-source economy.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

Sort:  

from the moment I started dealing with cryptos, I forgot to worry about the rest! surely the time to confirm a transaction is one of the worst! fortunately with this tragic fall my wallet is like that of Oliver Twist 😂😂😂 in any case, nice post buddy!

What about Hive?
The 3 second blocks on this network absolutely eliminate the bad user experience of waiting around for the transfer to be confirmed
— Hive comes to the rescue on this . This feature it possesses sure eliminates the anxious feelings that comes with making transfers on the blockchain.

I wonder how it must have been for starters, waiting for confirmation of their transaction. Cryto has surely improved a lot

With the recent multiple cases of exchange locking up the funds, it is really recommended to hold your crypto at your own wallet.

As Hive is my first and most used blockchain, I’m so used to near instant transfers that when I’m on other chains, delays give me a lot of anxiety. I have to start convincing myself that I did the right things. An even faster transaction would mean a lot down the line.

When one is sending $50M to another entity, 10 minutes an a $50 fee is pretty damn quick and cheap. Blazing fast, even

True

As Hive is my first and most used blockchain, I’m so used to near instant transfers that when I’m on other chains, delays give me a lot of anxiety. I have to start convincing myself that I did the right things. An even faster transaction would mean a lot down the line.

When one is sending $50M to another entity, 10 minutes an a $50 fee is pretty damn quick and cheap. Blazing fast, even

True

!CTP

The meta-network that you are describing could very well be the COSMOS ecosystem. It is a bunch of blockchains that (IMO) are faster and easier to navigate than EVM chains... and cheaper too. COSMOS SDK also brought THORChain and cough LUNA into existence... and all of these chains can securely transfer assets from chain to chain. BTC is now on the verge of getting a decentralized wrap on COSMOS and that will flip COSMOS DeFI on its head as the TVL on COSMOS is massive without anyone locking BTC as of yet.

Congratulations @edicted! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s):

You published more than 1800 posts.
Your next target is to reach 1900 posts.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

To support your work, I also upvoted your post!

Check out the last post from @hivebuzz:

Hive Power Month - New Tracking Calendar

I remember a really bad moment in 2017 when it took three weeks for my bitcoin to reach the exchange from my wallet.

The mempool was full, people sending transactions after me were paying higher fees and the miners were including transactions in their blocks based on the highest fees. Meanwhile my coins had left my wallet and were sitting in unconfirmed limbo land.

Bad times! That mad episode triggered a three year bear market.

The pain we're going through now is nothing compared to then.

We all know that if we sent crypto to the wrong wallet, the money is simply lost.

This risk of sending coins to black holes is an issue I can't understand why this still exists. What if there were a transaction type where both the sender and the receiver signed the transfer eliminating typing errors and use of expired adresses.

I had a few bad experiences so I know I'm always a bit touchy with larger amounts. LTC and Hive are my go-to transfers so the quick transfer times help with that anxiety.

Must be nice. I’ve never used LTC

Must be nice. I’ve never used LTC

LTC is also my go-to!

Cross blockchain transfers are my anxiety event now

I feel what you are saying constantly, but with cross blockchain transfers of value.

  • Going from HIve to BInance, Binance to Polygon, and with the Leo bridge system Binance to Hive and Hive to Polygon.
  • These are anxious moments for me because I run five investment projects for other people, so I am transferring other peoples money.
  • The good news is the projects started small and grew over a year, so now I have less aanxiety about the Cubfinance transfers, but I felt that familiar anxiety again when Polycub started.

Everything is suppose to be the same, yet it's just slightly different

  • one crss blockchain transfer should be like another cross blockchain transfer right? well actually no.
  • It's funny how just when you think you know what to expect you start interacting with a new blockchain and realize everything is the same...but different. Every interaction with a new blockchain has it's own unique quirks and idosyncracies.
  • And these are anxiety producing! :(
  • Its funny the more time you spend in this space gathering knowledge, the more you realize how much there is to learn.
  • Imagine that...
    @shortsegments
    C12B5FC99E3B47EF8A6742E02150C81B_1_201_a.jpeg

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

This post has been manually curated by @bhattg from Indiaunited community. Join us on our Discord Server.

Do you know that you can earn a passive income by delegating your Leo power to @india-leo account? We share 100 % of the curation rewards with the delegators.

Please contribute to the community by upvoting this comment and posts made by @indiaunited.