No one can justify why nations have historically exalted and revered philosophers and sages more than workers and craftsmen, even though the sage only offers the people a bundle of “famous sayings”, while the “baker”, for example, presents bundles of loaves that all the wise men line up to buy.
Moreover, in order to meditate and reflect upon these wisdoms, you will need bread before that; You can spend your day without a sermon or a saying, but you cannot spend it without bread, and the funny thing is that the “baker” may dispense with his whole life for the “wise”, but the wise will not be able to manage his affairs for one day without the “baker”.
Despite the tireless attempts made by the elite to steal or borrow the “superior importance” of the loaf and bestow it on knowledge, history has not yet recorded the death of any person because of the mediocrity of his knowledge, but he witnessed the death of millions due to starvation and poverty.
Nor did the lack of knowledge afflict anyone with insomnia; “The brother of ignorance thrives in his ignorance,” as the poet said, and how many “simple” people with little culture sleep satisfied since dusk; While the hungry roll with their stomachs in exasperation.
This is because the “wise” who straddled so long that his wisdom came to fruition, would not have been able to do that if he was hungry, or if he was obsessed with his needs.
While life requires a lot of courage and adventure, which cannot be done in the case of extreme wisdom; Where everything is carefully calculated, and subject to a feasibility study.
This is certainly not a plea that exalts ignorance and places it in a forced approach to hunger, but it is an attempt to read the matter another way: Why is the elevation of culture associated with a class? And why did you create knowledge, its brute class, and it is on its way to eradicate discrimination, as you claimed?
Over Times
It passes through Shakespeare's ambiguous image of the "servant", which was not decisive enough, down to the function of culture and knowledge now, whose first task is to transfer the "knowledge" to a new class as a promotion that he deserves. Therefore, there was no "pastoral" knowledge, which remains residing in its class. It performs its function in the traditional dress of a worker or manufacturer, and expresses its complete bias to its social root, without falling into the famous deception that talks about “class” as a past that has been successfully disposed of.
I mean that simple knowledge, the knowledge that was formed from the class and not against it, without always appearing bloody, and covered by class sores, as knowledge that is proud of itself and does not plan to be anything else, and I mean “the baker’s knowledge”, which no one thought of buying it, and they were satisfied with bread!
Although it is knowledge that has been matured for a long time, and is always tested, in a way that does not happen to that solid knowledge that he kept in books as it happens to “freezers”!
