i hold a very strong conviction that Blockchain: can be The Answer To Many World's Problems IF combined with an excellent decentralized #governance system.
Here's a quick view of some of the factors leading to excellent #decentralised governance, in my opinion.
There is more to this than meets the eye.
i would be extremely grateful for specific constructive criticism and questions.
https://leofinance.io/threads/atma.love/re-josedam-3ayxpy7qf
The rewards earned on this comment will go directly to the people ( atma.love ) sharing the post on LeoThreads,LikeTu,dBuzz.
This is huge @atma.love
I would have loved to have a clearer view of it. But according to what I can see you have put down the factors that result to a strong and more productive governance
Blockchain technology is bringing more revolutionary to different sectors. A deep pain in my heart is that most people thought blockchain is a technology that powers Bitcoin, yes but the really don't know blochain is capable of so much more...... Like governance and so on
Thanks for sharing 😀
A clearer view is available with some in depth research.
i may have @convinced @notconvinced to devise some knowledge tests based on information in posts about #thematrix8solution from which my diagram comes from
Would you help too?
See discussion here: https://leofinance.io/threads/view/notconvinced/re-atma-love-28st53wd9
I am becoming convinced you are really just a spammer.
Stop putting links to all your posts everywhere. You tried this shit with our threadcast.
Oh. i apologize for putting links in the threadcast. i thought they were relevant for the discussion. i now know better not to do so.
As for elsewhere, again i post relevant links where i think it is appropriate to help people find more information rather than copy pasting it in comments (which i know could be considered as spam as the second time it would not be original content).
Perhaps in the comment i made on a post of yours today [Edit: i now realise i'm replying to thread on that post] (which i again thought was relevant to the post re. decentralisation) which led to some long discussion threads including many relevant links, became too big. Maybe i should have moved it elsewhere. Do you prefer i stop referring people to that comment on your post?
Not sure what else to say.
i only have good intentions.
Sat Nam
Atma
I think each voting session should be able to choose which of these affecting factors it could take in.
For example, for voting about one issue, you might want new members to have the same voting chance as the ones with high longevity value if all other factors were the same.
What do you think?
By the way, is there a working version of this model that we/I can test?
Yes, i agree the vote weight factors could potentially vary depending upon the the particular matter. Best i think that vote weights for different types of meetings/matters are set in policy to avoid deciding how to set them for each meeting.
No coded working version. There's a DIY version which can be used to test how it works with a little set up first. Then we would need at least 25 peeps for a live meeting to test. i'll find link for DIY method and drop in Element group.
You tell me.
Does Bitcoin fulfil the criteria in that diagram?
If not, which parts does it not?
We can then examine the potential consequences of those parts if you like.
As far as I can tell, bitcoin works as money as long as you trust the data. I couldn't understand all the points in your diagram tbh.
Please tell me the specific parts you don't understand i and can explain further, or link you to an existing post which explains in more detail.
Are you referring to proof of stake or proof of work? Those are two different trust structures.
Good question. Thank you.
i am referring to neither.
Chain governance (security of the block chain code is a different subject.
i am referring to a particular Community governance system (#Matrix8), which can be used for members to come to consensus for design of and amendment to Community policies and Operations.
i am not referring to any particular community yet (except possibly #thematrix8solution community).
It could however, once refinement and implementation is complete enough to be useable and tested by a community.
It could however, potentially, with consensus of an existing community, be used to amend existing chain code governance
I imagine, to take part in a chain governance consensus meeting, there would be a requirement to have successfully passed knowledge tests which demonstrate a users understanding of chain governance design and the likely outcome of any changes.