@khaleelkazi "It would be wise to use accurate information as op..."

in #leofinance2 months ago

It would be wise to use accurate information as opposed to misinform readers about something

If a payout is missed due to any technical error, they are remediated either with a double payment in a subsequent day or an increase in APR over multiple days that follow.

The period you’re referring to was a temporary outage caused by node issues and we resolved that, then released two double payments + increased the APR. That is unlikely to be an issue in the future.

Edit your post for accuracy if you wish. But it’s inaccurate to say the yearly yield is incorrect.

Sort:  

I don't think people really know all the in's and out's of everything on Hive. I doubt he meant to shine it in a bad light..

Although you are correct.

I should probably do a more in depth review of this, so I will simply state and revise that this is my subjective view of things. I will try to do a more detailed review (and look at a longer time period) and see how things stand with missed/refunded payouts. Thanks for taking time to reply, again I appreciate your work 👍

Thank you

The problem with stating innacurate figures as a matter of fact is that some people will now read this - and you also advised them to review their delegation (basically saying to undelegate) - and make a decision based on a subject point of view that lacks data to back it

I appreciate your support past, present and future but a post like this can be quite harmful