Sort: Trending
Part 11/12:
Undergoing a comprehensive investigation, the post-incident assessment revealed valuable lessons for the crew, including the urgent need for effective communication and acknowledgment of situational threats. The ordeal raised important recommendations for future crew training emphasizing go-arounds from unstable approaches and highlighted the necessity for operational data monitoring to prevent similar occurrences.
Conclusion
Part 9/12:
G-forces unexpectedly shifted, dramatized by the cabin witnessing a literal reign of belongings and toilet water. Fortunately, the majority of the passengers remained in their seats thanks to secured seatbelts, but the moment became a nightmare scenario. Eventually, as the aircraft reached a minimal height of just 321 feet above ground, an eye-watering pitch up ensued, followed by a clutch to stabilize and climb.
Recovery and Consequences
Part 10/12:
Miraculously, the crew regained control of the aircraft and stabilized at 4,000 feet after experiencing extreme attitudes. Despite the major emotional and physical toll, both crew and passengers well understood that they narrowly avoided disaster. Upon successfully landing, neither pilot thoroughly briefed the cabin crew on the event, impeding any effort for psychological support or resolution for confused and alarmed passengers.
Part 1/12:
The Thrilling and Terrifying Experience of Flight 315
On January 22, 2002, a routine flight transformed into a tense struggle for control as Icelandair Flight 315 approached Oslo Gardermoen Airport. The Boeing 757, captained by an experienced pilot, was cruising at 37,000 feet over the North Atlantic with a relatively light passenger load when this flight's precarious sequence of events began.
The Calm Before the Storm
Part 2/12:
The day started like any other for the flight crew, with straightforward pre-flight planning amid mild January weather in Scandinavia. The temperatures hovered around minus four degrees Celsius, and while there were concerns about icing and potential light freezing rain, nothing foretold the tumultuous approach that was to come. The aircraft was deemed operational despite a few inoperative systems, and the crew felt prepared as they neared Oslo.
Part 3/12:
Initially intending to conduct a practice Category II autoland approach into Runway 01 Right, the captain had a solid foundation of almost 8,000 flight hours. His first officer, though inexperienced with approximately 2,500 total hours, was gradually acclimating to the cockpit environment. As they descended from cruising altitude, they were informed about a change in runway usage. This time, they would approach Runway 01 Left, which lacked Category II capabilities.
Approaching Turbulence
Part 4/12:
At around 200 nautical miles from Oslo, the crew was confronted with weather conditions that included light freezing drizzle and crucially, a significant tailwind of 20 knots reported at about 200 feet. Compounding the difficulty, the near-ground temperature inversion was creating a situation where the winds at altitude were markedly different from those at lower levels. This mirage of comfort space above would soon spiral into chaos below.
Part 5/12:
Despite being aware of the growing tailwind and the potential turbulence it posed during landing, the captains chose to proceed without fully evaluating the risks associated with their rapidly deteriorating altitude profile. As their speed increased due to the tailwind, they neglected an essential rule of descent: a strong tailwind necessitated extra distance and time to properly manage the approach.
The Descent Dilemma
Part 6/12:
As the aircraft descended, the air traffic controller granted them a clearance to progressively reduce their altitude. However, the captain realized they were continuously growing high on the glide slope. He deployed speed brakes to manage their approach, to limited effect. While the first officer remained disengaged from the growing energy issue, the cockpit effectively turned into a precarious ballet of decisions and adjustments.
Despite being informed that they would not hit the ideal descent profile, the two pilots continued under the impression that they could correct this in flight. Both the captain and the first officer failed to communicate effectively about the escalating situation - complacency creeping in as they prepared for landing.
The High-Stakes Go-Around
Part 7/12:
The approach entered its critical phase when cleared for landing at 10 nautical miles and at 3,000 feet, the aircraft was still above its glide slope. The captain, relying on autopilot, attempted to course correct but soon concluded that the situation required an active manual intervention by disconnecting the autopilot. Unfortunately, this decision only heightened complications, amplifying workload issues and further agitating the unstable situation.
Part 8/12:
As the aircraft continued its approach, both pilots began losing their situational awareness amid an increasingly hectic environment. When the captain finally called for a go-around, this was where the real turbulence started. The aircraft’s indicated airspeed was dangerously low, and as thrust was increased for the climb, it led to a dangerously high pitch attitude.
A Harrowing Descent
As they engaged with the go-around procedure, the captain's decision to maintain a manual flight turned chaotic. The aircraft pitched down to an alarming 49 degrees, leading to rapid acceleration and a terrifying dive. The speed climbed above operational limits for flaps 20 while alarms for terrain closure and altitude warnings blared, heightening cabin panic.
Part 12/12:
The events of Flight 315 serve not only as a testament to the precarious nature of aviation but also as a reminder of the vital importance of vigilance, communication, and continuous learning in the cockpit. As the industry evolves, the need for thorough training on stabilization, decision-making under pressure, and addressing issues of crew passivity remains paramount. Always, both thrilling and terrifying, aviation carries an element of risk that requires constant attention to detail - lest the rapid descent into chaos occur again.