«The "human" fallacy about the future» ¡Revamped!

in #science3 months ago

¿Is the FUTURE just a fallacy? Yeah, apparently some "physical" evidences hints that it is!

Howdy my dear readers.

Today I bring you a topic of #discussion that for these times that are running seems more than appropriate to debate. ¡The Future! yes the "future". Is there such a thing as the future? Some free thinkers out there begin to question it. As also did a great number of astronomers, scientists, researchers and philosophers centuries ago.

Apparently more and more "physical" evidences have emerged every day that suggests that we have long been living in an intimate mirage and perpetual fantasy that only resides in our own minds. Our own inner bubble in space-time continuum.

Alright! let's expand the concept just a little bit.

I think that on several occasions before, I have mentioned that I am a scientist. A research scientist indeed. But I also believe that I never made it clear to you what science specialty I graduated from. Well, I studied and graduated from physics. So, I suspect I must be a physicist at the core. Or at least that's what my college title says. :)

But yeah, to tell the truth, let's say that I never practiced physics as a profession for a long time due to the little field of work that my country offered me in that specialty of scientific research. So, after a couple of years practicing it in the academic area of the university environment and some of the few research institutions on the matter in my country. Due to strictly financial and economic reasons. I suddenly decided to switch and immerse myself more deeply in the Mathematics and Computer Graphics Research field of the flourishing HiTech industry as soon as the opportunity pop up.

And it has been precisely in the area of high technology that I have developed my career professionally since then. But without ever forgetting my first great love in the world of scientific research despite the fact that it was no longer able to reward me financially. Therefore, I never stop being up to date on the matters of this first love.

And well, you may wonder if all this that I have told you above is going to have any relevance with what I will develop next. Uhm, ok, let's let that you decide and you conclude that by yourself according to your own criteria. But for me, I think it was necessary to include that brief prelude in the discussion. And in few seconds you will see why.

So, The Future eh? Ok, here's the thing:

“How long is forever?” - asks Alice.
“Sometimes, just one second” - replies the White Rabbit.

  • ¿How do we know that the usual general perception is right and any other is wrong?

  • So, when we wake from a vivid dream. Is it often that we are dimly aware that the sense of time we have just experienced is illusory?

  • Oh yeah! “Quantum mechanics cannot deal with the curvature of spacetime and General relativity cannot account for quanta”

Therefore, as an attentive and keen observer in space-time from your own perspective and specific point of reference where you are standing. Between the Loop Theory and the String Theory. It is very easy to catch that Reality is not what it seems and at this level there is no evidence of time, let alone direction ...or existence. Isn't it?

  • The difference between past and future, between cause and effect, between memory and hope, between regret and intention in the elementary laws that describe the mechanism of the world, there is no such difference.

  • In a quantum world, with neither what we understand as substance or order, there are only events, which crowd around chaotically. At the deepest level of mathematical physics, time does not exist at all. Everything that man ignores does not exist for him. That's why the universe of each one is summed up to the size of his knowledge.

Well, in fact I don't have the intention to eat your brain too much with this subject. It's just that lately, through the Hive blockchain and somewhere else. I have been reading perhaps too many posts which talk often about the future or that refer to the future in some way.

Yeah, I suppose that due to the past circumstances of imposed confinement, isolation, quarantine and social distancing that happened four years ago worldwide. That all that unusual situation probably is awakening in people more often than ever feelings of anxiety, agitation, watchfulness, uncertainty, confusion and hopes in the future.

All these new unprecedented situations seen from the economic, financial, labor, human and social point of view that not only affects the usual markets and structures of the offline world. But also the technological digital world online. Including ours over here in the blockchain seem to inspire and lead people to generate an increasing amount of content talking and speculating about the future. Yeah! ...Tha Virtual Future...

...of Akashic Records!

Expectations, expectations, expectations and then hopes.

If you really believe in the future, it is not that this is going to hurt you. Nope, not in the least. But just to conclude this post and reflection. From now on, let me just add one last audiovisual scientific evidence to better illustrate what I wanted to convey and signify in this article. From my extravagant "scientist" point of view of course.

«-Doppler Effect-»

In simple words, it is precisely the concept of the Doppler Effect as illustrated and explained in this previous video, which I have chosen to try to make you question and reconsider whether your current perception of the "future" and the concept of the "future" as it has been instilled in you all these years, if it still maintains the same coherence, certainty and conviction that you had after having consumed the entire content of this post.

But what I really wanted to conclude in relation with the future. The potential and possible existence of the future or simply our very own perception of the future. Is specifically the following:

Are we here, there or over there? Is past, present and future the same thing depending of the perspective from where we are standing? Assuming we have an accurate answer for these previous questions. Toward where and at what pitch frequency do you think our consciousness and reality moves?

  1. Both are perceived with red-shifts and low-pitch changes simultaneously?
  2. Both are perceived with blue-shifts and high-pitch changes simultaneously?
  3. Reality with blue-shifts and high-pitch changes and our Consciousness in the opposite direction?
  4. Consciousness with blue-shifts and high-pitch changes and Reality in the opposite direction?
  5. Any other combinations/permutations you can add?

Regardless of your light's perceptions toward red-shifts or blue-shifts. Regardless of your sound's perceptions toward high-pitch or low-pitch changes, you as an observer you are perceiving everything only from the peculiar position and own perspective of your own mind. And this peculiar position and perspective usually never matches anyone else's. Merely for three simple reasons:

  1. No one simultaneously occupies the same position at the same time in the same space-time. And much less in the "frequencies" of your own mind.

  2. There will never be such a thing as the future if you just remain static and not in constant motion. The future never comes to you, you have to move to find it.

  3. If you are unable to perceive light red-shifts or blue-shifts and sound changes in the frequency and tone between what is approaching or moving away. Then my friend, there is no future for you no matter what you hope. ¡This is all pure physics!

Leave a comment. Share your experiences and feedback. ¡Be part of the conversation!

«««-$-»»»

"Follows, Comments, Rehives & Upvotes will be highly appreciated"

Cranky Gandalf

Cheers!

Sort:  

The Vopson video is very interesting, but I didn´t get at all why the experiment should proof anything. Just by increasing the temperature, the particles are not changed in their nature or in their "information" content. Not sure what I miss here.

PS: In your profile description you have still "steemian" - honestly??

I didn't watch the video, but I may be able to offer an explanation anyway.

Any increase in temperature increases the frequency of atomic vibrations, which could be seen as higher bandwidth, just as it is with processor clock speeds or telecommunications frequencies.

Sure, but why should that be a proof for the simulation theory?

As far as I can tell, it isn't.

Hello

You may be losing curation rewards when upvoting blacklisted scam accounts as the votes on these accounts tend to be equalised.

Capture.PNG