Plane crash in South Korea makes me think about 9/11 conspiracy theory

rocket47 in #hive-122315 • 19 days ago

There was a tragic plane crash at Muan International Airport in South Korea. Here is an NBC article:

179 killed, two survive in plane crash at South Korean airport

The Boeing 737-800 plane took off from Bangkok shortly after 2 a.m. local time (2 p.m. Saturday ET), according to the flight-tracking platform FlightAware.
...
The pilots initially tried to land on the airport’s Runway 1, he said, but control tower instructed them to land on the opposite side, Runway 19, because of a bird strike warning. A bird strike is a collision between a bird and an aircraft.

A minute later, the pilots sent a mayday signal following a bird strike and tried to land on Runway 19.

As it was passing over the runway, the plane failed to lower its landing gear and struck a safety system called a localizer — which provides guidance during landing — and it crashed into a wall...

If you see the video of the crash, you can see that Boeing 747 rams into some kind of concrete wall.

If you search for "Muan International Airport" on Google Maps, you can identify the wall which the plane crashed into.

That Boeing 737-800 was a big plane with 181 people in it. If one concrete wall stopped that plane, how can such planes(though they were Boeing 767s, bigger than 737) cause complete demolition of 1300-feet tall World Trade Center buildings? It's been decades but perfectly vertical collapses of WTC twin towers still puzzle me.

#muan #informationwar #deepdives #vyb

19 days ago in #hive-122315 by rocket47

0.33 VYB

Sort:

Trending

[-]

valued-customer 18 days ago

"If one concrete wall stopped that plane, how can such planes(though they were Boeing 767s, bigger than 737) cause complete demolition of 1300-feet tall World Trade Center buildings?"

The truth is planes did not cause the demolition of the twin towers. The planes struck the towers high up, which did not weaken the lower parts of the structure and cause them to collapse. During my several careers I have worked as a logger, lumbering in the timber mines. Trees are not felled by cutting them towards the top, and then falling into piles of firewood rounds at the stump. The structures above the plane strikes were neither harmed, and just as happens when trees are topped by climbers, the upper portions above the plane strikes would have toppled to the sides if that were the only damage to the buildings.

The structures falling into their footprints is proof of controlled demolition. The strongest proof of this is building 7, which was not struck by a plane at all, also collapsing into it's footprint. Additionally, the BBC said it had collapsed ~20 minutes prior to that collapse even showing the structure still standing while they were saying it had collapsed, and 'Lucky Larry' stating directly the building was considered unsafe and was deliberately 'pulled', which is a euphemism for deliberate demolition.

Thanks!

0.00 VYB

[-]

rocket47 18 days ago

I agree, it doesn't make sense at all. Maybe we're living in a gigantic matrix contructed by people behind the government, media, and big corporations. When you notice glitches and talk about them, you become a crazy conspiracy theorist.

For a long time, I wasn't sure about what I saw, but after COVID-19 fake pandemic I lost all the remaining trust in mainstream narratives whatever it might be.

0.12 VYB

1 vote