Canada Withdraws C19 Jabs 'Urgently' to be Destroyed

in #life3 months ago

Castreau has mastered the art of duplicity, saying one thing while doing another, and the leaders of national governments globally have this skill in common, though few developed to the degree Castreau has.

So, we can handily discount whatever Castreau and Canada have to say about why this sudden about face regarding the extant vaccines withdraws them from the market immediately, as the recent publications of peer reviewed science demonstrating the hazards of the jabs that have today killed ~30M people worldwide.

According to Dr. William Makis (@makisMD on X):

"“To all the Covid vaccine clinics, to all the pharmacies, to all the Walmart parking lots, the stadiums, the back allies at Superstore, wherever Covid vaccines were given and whoever gave them – I have a message for you,” said Dr. Makis.

“You may be wondering if one day you will be held accountable for injecting a toxic pharmaceutical product into people who were then injured or died suddenly… You may be wondering if one day justice will be coming for you.

“In the meantime though, I have probably the best piece of advice I can give you. Do not under any circumstance remove or destroy vials of Covid-19 vaccines as you may have been instructed by Health Canada or by your bosses.

“Save those vials of vaccines. These vials are worth their weight in gold. They will be worth an absolute fortune. There is right now an attempt to cover up and destroy evidence of a very serious crime.

“These vaccines are contaminated. There will be labs in the future that are going to want to test these vaccines. Hundreds of them, maybe thousands of them, and they will pay top dollar.

“Do not let Health Canada and the government destroy these vaccines. Save these vials of Covid-19 vaccines. Do not let them get destroyed.”

The People's Voice doesn't mince words either, publishing the statement of ICC Prosecution regarding the evidentiary nature of the recalled jabs as to crimes against humanity they, in association with the blatantly false claims of Castreau and myriad others, were used to commit.

The statement is gut-wrenching for those of us that have lost loved ones, and wrestled with the gaslighting, lockdowns, and various despotic afflictions we suffered to remain unexposed to these bioweapons. I recommend the last link for those seeking some hope that closure for these horrific genocidal crimes that left us bereft of our beloved friends and family is forthcoming.

We have the power to hang the genocidal madmen that did this to us, and it is being exercised now.

Sort:  

System updating to new software.

New vaccines roll in

Download new software update?

[Yes] or yes

You chose [Yes]. Ok please wait for download to be complete.

Injection

update is downloading.

Complete.

3 new strains found in your computer.

Report?

Yes or [yes]

Checking....

New software available, download?

That's not going to last very long. The market gets thin as they die off. The advent of AI is going to replace doctors and medical care with apps, and dangerous toxic poisons with proper nutrition folks grow and prepare themselves. The toxic goyslop/deadly pharmaceutical pipeline is self-limiting.

Thanks!

I was thinking that app might be similar to the PIE π network which required KYC before launch to mine and also to use their apps. I was thinking, that was the direction it was going with it. Who knows though.

Dear @valued-customer !

In the world I live in, that news is not known.

That's why I reported it here.

Thanks!

Those who took them and are alive, have no words to utter. I just yesterday spoke to a distant friend of mine, whom I told that I lost my job, through being fired to not have me - not once - been tested and not wearing a mask, I lost two friends (no contact whatsoever) and that I payed my price and never will return to the work and institutions who led me down. That I was right about the lies and all others were wrong who believed in the betrayals. She listened and responded nothing.

I am not desperate, only more real. More things are to come.

We were just on the brink to a nuclear war the last weekend, since the British government almost got permission to use long range missiles to attack Russian territory. We were saved by some sane voice within the apparatus who told the involved that the Russian don't bluff.

It's hard to live with all the knowledge and still enjoy life. But weirdly enough, I often enough do.

"It's hard to live with all the knowledge and still enjoy life. But weirdly enough, I often enough do."

Sometimes I seem to enjoy surviving the more when I face death and destruction.

Thanks!

Making something out of a nothing burger and raking in thirteen bucks for it, hive logic for you. They are switching out vaccines because of a new supposed variant, more likely to create a demand for new orders to make it worth big pharma's trouble producing a vaccine whose demand has sunken considerably. You aren't meeting a demand criteria for production, get rid of the old ones and placing orders for new ones creates that demand. The poisoning of the population goes on.

Are you having difficulties? I am worried about you. I didn't have any trouble understanding the significance of the evidentiary nature of the jabs, and the ICC has recently confirmed it's relevance to the rule of law, which makes your 'nothingburger' comment suggestive of distress you are suffering.

You seem to simultaneously conflate a sense of helplessness and support for despotic power over you, which I find confusing, even disturbing. Are you ok?

You said it yourself a few months back when that German guy, I forget his name right off the bat, was doing a trail run video of testimony, or something of that nature, like he was before the court. I think I asked if that was real, or finally getting somewhere, and you replied it was never going to go anywhere despite them doing a documentary of the evidence they'd collected.
No, what I was getting on about, was you thinking they were destroying evidence deliberately, they weren't. They were trying to create demand for the upcoming "vaccine" season. You probably seen where some tiny place USA's health department came out and said they weren't going to provide covid vaccines anymore, one, the demand isn't there for them, and two, providing the vaccines to them was essentially saying they endorsed the safety of the vaccine. With the latter half of that being huge, even from a tiny little community to admit.

That's the way it's been for quite some time, the demand is dwindling leaving them with overstock. The gimmick is to come up a new variant that creates demand as those still taking them aren't going to get vaccinated again for the same variant. Doesn't matter here what the ICC says, look at Israel and Gaza as an example and the outcome over the arrest warrants. The US doesn't participate, and they threatened to sanction them, the US just threatened to crush the countries who voted for the warrants.
Here, now, thanks to Trump's political prosecution calls, they all have immunity. Every single one of them. Funny how that was the only case that ended up thus far being heard by the supreme court. The one that would give them "all" immunity from prosecution, the entire executive branch. It was never about presidential immunity, especially given how Trump was presenting the case, he based his case on that only congress through impeachment can prosecute a president. If that were the case, the SC would have agreed, but that's not what they were getting at. Not in the form of how James Sherk's constitutional option was first presented as a theory that presidents have immunity from prosecution in 2017 working as an advisor to Trump. They wanted to test that theory. It was not noted in any of the articles I read involving James Sherks he was basing that on congress being the only one's who can prosecute a president through impeachment but that's the argument they gave to get it to the SC. No one was even aware of the basis of the argument until one of the SC justices brought it to light. I can't repeat word for word what he said without having to go look, but it's in the judgement and narrowing it down it basically just means it was to far a stretch. It went from being focused on presidential immunity to conduct between executive branch members and the need not to impair the function of executive branch members by threats of prosecution. There will be exigencies, way to many to list, that can result in the prosecution of executive branch members, if they are found to be egregious acts conducted outside the authority of the executive branch. First, though, they have to build a strong enough case, and in building that case they can't use any private discussions on the matter, or be forced to turn over documents, or compelled to testify. Neither can anyone else outside the executive branch who worked with them, they all have immunity from prosecution unless an obvious, egregious crime(s) took place that the evidence collected presents a compelling case that a crime was committed by executive branch members outside the authority they hold. Then and only then can they be compelled to turn over documents/discussions and be compelled to testify. So if no one talks, they all walk, every last one of them. All the way back to the Bush family to the finality. Including Dick Cheney, and I say that because the reality is that Liz Cheney wasn't having some kind of mid life crisis and wanted to go into politics, her entry into politics coincided with the discussion back in 2017 when they found themselves discussing the matter. Her abrupt exit wasn't really because Trump took her down, it was because her job was done. She had just as much a compelling reason to get these political prosecutions calls going to get it to the SC as Trump did, she wanted to protect her dad, and in doing so, she was the only trusted viable means of communication between what was about to transpire back to the Bush/Cheney family.

You guys are so horrible at connecting the dots, I have to do all this work for you to shed the light, but you get all the pay and high glory while you grant me a penny pittance.

Two cents.

But, this all just verifies what I've always maintained, which is that corruption is cumulative and over time institutions become utterly antithetical to whatever purpose they were instituted to fulfill. This is why Pasha Glubb showed that empires have a lifetime of ~250 years, coincidentally just two years from now for the USA.

Thanks!