in #hive-1503297 months ago

"...your eye cannot see any pronouns."

Presently, the law prescribes specific behaviour by such professionals, particularly teachers, and there is a wide range of legally mandated behaviours in diverse jurisdictions, ranging from laws against grooming children, which affirmation of transsexual identification by a child under tutelage certainly can be considered to be, to compulsory affirmation of their transsexual/transhuman identification. Furthering the deranging power of lawfare are biologically insuperable laws regarding majority, because post-pubertal individuals are treated as children and ubiquitously obey their biological imperatives rather than irrational and oppressive laws. In many jurisdictions in the West both ends of this spectrum are legally mandated, so it is actually impossible to be in compliance with all laws regarding these matters, facilitating arbitrary law enforcement in order to implement harmful policies desirable to overlords increasing their mastery of hapless serfs. Preventing families from creating good marriages for their kids, causing adolescents to despoil their biological imperative to create strong pair bonds, and deranging marriage to the point that almost every jurisdiction in the world no longer successfully maintains their populations reproductively all result from the multivarious derangements of human biology being imposed.

"He must answer "no"."

I am absolutely certain you know from experience that respondents answer lots of things besides 'no'.

I agree with your reckoning of authority and responsibility regarding the sexual self identification by children. However, I view government as a vector for criminal corruption, and the Identarian propaganda with which children are being indoctrinated a crime against humanity that victimizes children worst of all, but not them alone, because parents, teachers, and everyone that has any professional or personal liability for children are also secondarily targeted. Parental rights, responsibility, and cultural traditions are being eradicated by laws in such matters, and I observe such erosion of our human rights in this regard dovetails and exacerbates other such erosions being imposed through corrupt jurisdictions and agents.

Unfortunately for civil societies, a global technocracy is being imposed pan-culturally, and human rights that underlay most cultures are being attacked differentially per the various ways they support that diversity of cultures, in order to create a global society of hapless, incompetent, (preferably) illiterate thralls that can be more easily and profitably victimized by overlords. From bodily integrity to intellectual freedom, any tradition or societal norm that impedes the mastery of thralls by this class of overlords is being diminished and eradicated. These political crimes are neither just nor logically consistent. When abortion or promiscuity (even by children) can be advanced by affirming individual autonomy, the principle of autonomy is proclaimed via slogans like 'your body your choice'. When mandatory subjection to experimental medical testing or harmful physical abuse are the goal, false claims of governmental authority to impose medical treatments and PPE (masks, biometric surveillance, captivity, isolation, and etc.) are asserted and rationalized as necessary 'for the greater good'.

Examples to follow are provided for the easily led, as well as those more recalcitrant.

NaomiWattsAndSon.jpg

LivSchreiberAndSon.jpg

tl;dr Doing what is right in this regard is criminalized by corrupt jurisdictions, leaving parents, teachers, and other professionals liable to unjust prosecution for failing to comply with legally mandated crimes against humanity.

Thanks!

Sort:  

Furthering the deranging power of lawfare are biologically insuperable laws regarding majority

it is actually impossible to be in compliance with all laws regarding these matters, facilitating arbitrary law enforcement

True.

If legislation sees itself as a central moral authority, it abuses what it has not been given.

It may determine what happens when someone breaks moral principles, but it must not itself call upon and encourage people to decide against their own conscience and reality.

The new "self-determination laws" all over the world do just that: they say that anyone who wants to can declare reality and objectivity to be an idea in their own head.

This is the famous scene in films where the bully asks: "How many fingers do I show?" (pointing four fingers) and the person being asked has to answer that "there are five fingers".

It is probably the worst of all forms of driving a person to despair to tell him that what he sees objectively not only does not have to be denied by him, but also that it should be denied voluntarily and gladly.
Wasting one's precious life time dealing with bullies who now show up in classes as children is often more than anyone who knows full well that reality MUST be objectifiable can handle.

It seems to be the ultimate maturity test for all of us.
We must stay cool.

I am absolutely certain you know from experience that respondents answer lots of things besides 'no'.

I do. Although they do answer "no" (because they cannot beat logic) but eagerly put a "but" behind it. You gotta catch them before they get into the "buts".